...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Evaluation of Two New Automated Assays for Hepatitis B Virus Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Detection: IMMULITE HBsAg and IMMULITE 2000 HBsAg
【24h】

Evaluation of Two New Automated Assays for Hepatitis B Virus Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Detection: IMMULITE HBsAg and IMMULITE 2000 HBsAg

机译:评估两种新的自动检测乙型肝炎病毒表面抗原(HBsAg)的方法:IMMULITE HBsAg和IMMULITE 2000 HBsAg

获取原文
           

摘要

In recent years the diagnostic industry has developed new automated immunoassays for the qualitative detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) in serum and plasma samples that are performed on analyzers that permit a high-speed throughput, random access, and primary tube sampling. The aim of the present study was the evaluation of two new automated HBsAg screening assays, IMMULITE HBsAg and IMMULITE 2000 HBsAg, from Diagnostic Products Corporation. The new HBsAg assays were compared to well-established tests (Auszyme Monoclonal [overnight incubation, version B], IMx HBsAg, AxSYM HBsAg, and Prism HBsAg [all from Abbott] and Elecsys HBsAg [Roche Diagnostics]). In the evaluation were included seroconversion panels, sera from the acute and chronic phases of infection, dilution series of various HBsAg standards, HBV subtypes and S gene mutants. To challenge the specificity of the new assays, sera from HBsAg-negative blood donors, pregnant women, and dialysis and hospitalized patients and potentially cross-reactive samples were investigated. IMMULITE HBsAg and IMMULITE 2000 HBsAg, although not as sensitive as the Elecsys HBsAg assay, were equivalent to the AxSYM HBsAg assay and showed a higher sensitivity than the Auszyme Monoclonal B and IMx HBsAg systems for detection of acute infection in seroconversion panels. The specificities (100%) of both IMMULITE assays on unselected blood donors and potentially interfering samples were comparable to those of the alternative assays after repeated testing. In conclusion, the new IMMULITE HBsAg and IMMULITE 2000 HBsAg assays show a good sensitivity for HBsAg detection compared to other well-established tests. The specificity on repeatedly tested samples was equivalent to that of the alternative assays. The rapid turnaround time, primary tube sampling, and on-board dilution make it an interesting assay system for clinical laboratory diagnosis.
机译:近年来,诊断行业已经开发了用于定性检测血清和血浆样品中乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)表面抗原(HBsAg)的新型自动化免疫分析方法,这些分析方法可在分析仪上进行,以实现高速通量,随机访问和原发性管采样。本研究的目的是评估Diagnostic Products Corporation的两种新的自动HBsAg筛选检测方法,即IMMULITE HBsAg和IMMULITE 2000 HBsAg。将新的HBsAg分析方法与公认的测试方法进行比较(Auszyme单克隆抗体[过夜孵育,B版],IMx HBsAg,AxSYM HBsAg和Prism HBsAg [均来自雅培]和Elecsys HBsAg [Roche Diagnostics])。评估中包括血清转换小组,感染的急性和慢性阶段的血清,各种HBsAg标准品的稀释系列,HBV亚型和S基因突变体。为了挑战新检测方法的特异性,对HBsAg阴性献血者,孕妇,透析患者和住院患者的血清以及可能发生交叉反应的样品进行了研究。 IMMULITE HBsAg和IMMULITE 2000 HBsAg虽然不如Elecsys HBsAg测定灵敏,但与AxSYM HBsAg测定相当,并且在血清转化试验中检测急性感染的灵敏度高于Auszyme单克隆B和IMx HBsAg系统。在反复测试后,IMMULITE分析在未选择的献血者和潜在干扰样品上的特异性(100%)与替代分析相当。总之,与其他完善的测试方法相比,新的IMMULITE HBsAg和IMMULITE 2000 HBsAg检测方法对HBsAg检测具有良好的敏感性。对重复测试的样品的特异性与其他测定的特异性相同。快速的周转时间,初级试管采样和机载稀释使其成为用于临床实验室诊断的有趣分析系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号