...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Evaluation of the MicroScan antimicrobial susceptibility system with the autoSCAN-4 automated reader.
【24h】

Evaluation of the MicroScan antimicrobial susceptibility system with the autoSCAN-4 automated reader.

机译:使用autoSCAN-4自动阅读器评估MicroScan抗菌药敏系统。

获取原文

摘要

The American MicroScan (American MicroScan, Mahwah, N.J.) identification and antimicrobial susceptibility system consists in part of an automated reading system (autoSCAN-4) with data management capabilities. We evaluated the system with 404 gram-negative and 170 gram-positive facultative anaerobic and aerobic bacteria. We compared MicroScan results read automatically and visually with each other and with the results obtained by the reference method (read visually). The overall agreement within +/- 1 log2 dilution was 94.3% when the MicroScan system (read automatically) was compared with the reference method (read visually), 96.4% when MicroScan panels (read visually) were compared with reference panels, and 97.4% when the autoSCAN-4 automated reading was compared with the visual reading of the MicroScan panels. Total discrepancies (susceptibility interpretation category changes) for the MicroScan system compared with the reference method were 7%, with 6.2% considered a minor discrepancy. The autoSCAN-4 and the complete MicroScan system yielded accurate results compared with the reference method.
机译:American MicroScan(American MicroScan,新泽西州Mahwah)鉴定和抗菌药敏系统由具有数据管理功能的自动读取系统(autoSCAN-4)组成。我们用404克阴性和170克阳性兼性厌氧和好氧细菌评估了系统。我们将自动和可视读取的MicroScan结果与通过参考方法(可视读取)获得的结果相互比较。当将MicroScan系统(自动读取)与参考方法(视觉读取)进行比较时,+ /-1 log2稀释度内的总体一致性为94.3%,当将MicroScan面板(视觉读取)与参考面板进行比较时为96.4%,以及97.4%当将autoSCAN-4自动读数与MicroScan面板的视觉读数进行比较时。与参考方法相比,MicroScan系统的总差异(敏感性解释类别变化)为7%,其中6.2%被认为是轻微差异。与参考方法相比,autoSCAN-4和完整的MicroScan系统产生了准确的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号