首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Evaluation of Detect-A-Strep and the Culturette Ten-Minute Strep ID kits for detection of group A streptococcal antigen in oropharyngeal swabs from children.
【24h】

Evaluation of Detect-A-Strep and the Culturette Ten-Minute Strep ID kits for detection of group A streptococcal antigen in oropharyngeal swabs from children.

机译:评价Detect-A-Strep和培养液十分钟Strep ID试剂盒,以检测儿童口咽拭子中的A组链球菌抗原。

获取原文
           

摘要

The Detect-A-Strep kit (DAS) (Antibodies Inc.) and the Culturette Brand 10-Minute Group A Strep ID kit (CBTMSI) (Marion Scientific) were compared with a sensitive culture method for detection of group A streptococci in oropharyngeal swabs from children. Specimens from 953 children ranging in age from 4 months to 18 years were inoculated to selective blood agar plates containing sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim. Culture plates were incubated anaerobically for the first overnight period and aerobically in the presence of 10% CO2 for the second overnight period. The same specimens were tested within 24 h by DAS (phase 1) or CBTMSI (phase 2). One hundred thirty-five of 538 specimens (25.1%) tested by DAS and 150 of 415 specimens (36.1%) tested by CBTMSI were culture positive. DAS detected 87 of 135 (64.4%) and CBTMSI detected 93 of 150 (62.0%) culture-positive specimens. The specificities of DAS and CBTMSI were 96.5 and 99.6%, respectively. The predictive values of positive and negative results were 86.1 and 89.0% for DAS and 98.9 and 82.2% for CBTMSI. Because a reliable distinction between infected patients and carrier state patients cannot be made, we conclude that neither DAS nor CBTMSI is sufficiently sensitive to replace our culture method.
机译:将Detect-A-Strep试剂盒(DAS)(Antibodies Inc.)和Culturette Brand 10分钟A组Strep ID试剂盒(CBTMSI)(Marion Scientific)与敏感培养方法相比较,以检测口咽拭子中A组链球菌来自儿童。将953名年龄从4个月至18岁的儿童的标本接种到含有磺胺甲恶唑-三甲氧苄啶的选择性血琼脂平板上。将培养板在第一个晚上厌氧培养,第二个晚上在10%CO2有氧条件下进行有氧培养。通过DAS(阶段1)或CBTMSI(阶段2)在24小时内测试了相同的样本。 DAS测试的538个样本中有135个样本(25.1%),CBTMSI测试的415个样本中有150个样本(36.1%)培养阳性。 DAS检测到135个培养阳性样本中的87个(64.4%),CBTMSI检测了150个(62.0%)培养阳性样本中的93个。 DAS和CBTMSI的特异性分别为96.5和99.6%。 DAS的阳性和阴性结果的预测值为86.1%,CBTMSI的预测值为98.9和82.2%。因为不能对感染患者和携带者状态患者进行可靠的区分,所以我们得出结论,DAS和CBTMSI都不足以替代我们的培养方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号