...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Rapid Shell Vial Culture Technique for Detection of Enteroviruses and Adenoviruses in Fecal Specimens: Comparison with Conventional Virus Isolation Method
【24h】

Rapid Shell Vial Culture Technique for Detection of Enteroviruses and Adenoviruses in Fecal Specimens: Comparison with Conventional Virus Isolation Method

机译:粪便标本中肠道病毒和腺病毒的快速壳病毒培养技术:与常规病毒分离方法的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Detection of enteroviruses and adenoviruses mainly in fecal specimens by rapid culture with inoculation onto cell monolayers in flat-bottom tubes by centrifugation and immunofluorescence staining with genus-specific monoclonal antibodies was compared with that by the conventional virus isolation procedure. For both conventional culture and shell vial culture human lung fibroblast cells and tertiary monkey kidney cells were used. For enterovirus detection, 979 clinical specimens (916 stool specimens, 56 cerebrospinal fluid specimens, and 7 nasopharyngeal swabs) were used. Conventional culture detected 74 enterovirus isolates. A cytopathic effect compatible with the presence of an enterovirus after 3 days of incubation occurred in 25 of the 74 (34%) specimens that eventually became positive. The detection rate for enteroviruses by rapid cell culture after 2 to 3 days of incubation was 42 of 74 (57%). The genus-specific enterovirus monoclonal antibody did not react with strains of echovirus types 22 and 23 or enterovirus type 71. Rapid cell culture for the detection of adenoviruses was performed with 567 clinical specimens (536 stool specimens, 25 cerebrospinal fluid specimens, and 6 miscellaneous specimens), in which 42 adenoviruses were found by conventional culture. Nine of the 42 (21%) adenovirus isolates were detected by conventional culture within 3 days after inoculation, whereas 21 (50%) were found by rapid cell culture within 2 to 3 days. Only two of the nine specimens found to be positive for the enteric adenovirus type 41 by conventional culture as well by a type-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tested positive by rapid cell culture. In conclusion, the rapid shell vial assay allows the early detection and identification of enteroviruses and adenoviruses in clinical specimens but is markedly less sensitive than the conventional isolation procedure according to the eventual results of the conventional isolation procedure. Conventional cell culture remains a prerequisite for serotyping of enteroviral isolates. On the basis of the results for adenovirus type 41, the rapid detection of adenoviruses was not considered to be useful for the detection of clinically relevant adenoviruses in fecal samples.
机译:通过快速培养并接种到平底管中的细胞单层上,通过离心和用属特异性单克隆抗体进行的免疫荧光染色,将粪便标本中的肠病毒和腺病毒检测与常规病毒分离方法进行了比较。对于常规培养和壳小瓶培养,都使用人肺成纤维细胞和第三猴肾细胞。为了检测肠病毒,使用了979个临床标本(916个粪便标本,56个脑脊液标本和7个鼻咽拭子)。常规培养检测到74种肠道病毒分离株。孵育3天后,与肠道病毒相容的细胞病变效应发生在74个样本(34%)中的25个样本中,这些样本最终变为阳性。孵育2至3天后,通过快速细胞培养对肠病毒的检出率为74的42(57%)。属特异性肠病毒单克隆抗体与22型和23型呼肠孤病毒或71型肠道病毒不发生反应。用567个临床标本(536个粪便标本,25个脑脊液标本和6个其他标本)进行了快速细胞培养以检测腺病毒。标本),通过常规培养发现了42种腺病毒。在接种后3天内通过常规培养检测到42种腺病毒分离株中的9株(占21%),而在2到3天内通过快速细胞培养发现了21株(50%)腺病毒。通过常规培养以及通过快速细胞培养检测为阳性的类型特异性酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),发现九份标本中只有两份对41型肠腺病毒呈阳性。总之,根据常规分离方法的最终结果,快速管形瓶测定法可以早期检测和鉴定临床标本中的肠病毒和腺病毒,但其灵敏度明显低于常规分离方法。常规细胞培养仍然是肠病毒分离株血清分型的前提。根据41型腺病毒的结果,快速检测腺病毒不被认为对粪便样品中临床相关腺病毒的检测有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号