...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility methods for detection of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.
【24h】

Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility methods for detection of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.

机译:比较抗药性方法对耐青霉素的肺炎链球菌的检测。

获取原文

摘要

We sought to determine if commercially available susceptibility tests were accurate in detecting penicillin resistance and relative resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. We compared the reference MIC method with oxacillin disk screening and three commercial tests, E-test (AB Biodisk), JustOne (Radiometer America), and MicroScan Pos MIC Panel Type 6 (Baxter Diagnostics), with 80 selected clinical isolates. Thirty-three additional isolates were tested by the reference method and the E-test to further validate the latter method. Oxacillin screening was effective in detecting all penicillin-resistant and relatively resistant strains of S. pneumoniae. The MicroScan method was not effective in detecting penicillin resistance or relative resistance. The JustOne system classified only 6 (35%) of 17 resistant strains correctly, with 11 resistant strains classified as relatively resistant. The E-test correctly classified 30 (83%) of 36 resistant isolates, with 6 resistant isolates interpreted as relatively resistant. For determining penicillin MICs for S. pneumoniae, the E-test was the most accurate of the commercial systems that we studied.
机译:我们试图确定市售药敏试验在检测肺炎链球菌的青霉素耐药性和相对耐药性方面是否准确。我们将参考MIC方法与奥沙西林圆盘筛选以及三个商业测试(E测试(AB Biodisk),JustOne(美国辐射仪)和MicroScan Pos MIC Panel Type 6(Baxter Diagnostics))进行了比较,并选择了80种临床分离株。通过参考方法和E检验对另外33个分离株进行了测试,以进一步验证后者的方法。奥沙西林筛选可有效检测所有耐青霉素和相对耐药的肺炎链球菌菌株。 MicroScan方法在检测青霉素抗性或相对抗性方面无效。 JustOne系统仅正确分类了17个抗性菌株中的6个(35%),其中11个抗性菌株被分类为相对抗性。 E-检验正确分类了36株抗性菌株中的30株(83%),其中6株抗性菌株被认为具有相对抗性。为了确定肺炎链球菌的青霉素MIC,E检验是我们研究的最准确的商业系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号