Responses of body fat mobilization to isoproterenol or epinephrine challenge in adult cows: influence of energy level, breed, and body fatness

摘要

The sustainability of livestock production systems facing climatic or economic changes is linked in part to the potential of the female ruminants to adapt to feeding constraints through metabolic and hormonal regulation, notably responses of body fat mobilization, depending on adipose tissue (AT) lipolysis. Our hypothesis was that these responses could change according to genotype (breed) and body fatness. Six fat, nonpregnant, nonlactating Charolais cows, six fat Holstein cows, and six lean Holstein cows were used in a 2 × 2 crossover design with two treatments (underfeeding or overfeeding, at 62% [low] or 128% [high] of maintenance energy requirements [MER], respectively) and two periods. Isoproterenol (ISO, a nonselective β-adrenergic agonist) or epinephrine (EPI, a β- and α2-adrenergic agonist) was injected (6 nmol/kg of lean mass). Blood samples were collected regularly from ?20 to 75 min after the injection and then were analyzed for NEFA, glycerol, glucose, and L-lactate. Underfeeding greatly increased (P 0.001) basal plasma NEFA concentrations (+467%, +264%, and +600% for fat Charolais, fat Holstein, and lean Holstein cows, respectively). For each drug, underfed cows had higher NEFA or glycerol responses to adrenergic challenges than overfed cows. Fat Charolais cows had higher basal plasma NEFA (P 0.05) concentrations (+64.9%) than fat Holstein cows. The plasma NEFA or glycerol response at 5 min (P 0.05) was higher for fat Charolais than for fat Holstein cows, whatever the injected drug. Basal plasma lactate concentration and lactate response to ISO or EPI were higher (P 0.05) for fat Charolais cows than for fat Holstein cows. Fat Holstein cows had higher (P 0.01) basal glycerol (+18.4%) than lean Holstein cows. This increase could be linked to the increased AT mass. ISO increased more lipolytic responses in fat than in lean Holstein cows, whereas EPI increased more these responses in lean than in fat Holstein cows (drug × fatness interaction), suggesting an increased antilipolytic effect due to α2-AR stimulation in fat cows. Breed had a significant effect on basal and stimulated fat mobilization as well as lactate concentrations, suggesting that the Charolais breed could be more sensitive to stress.