...
首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps using high-definition i-scan: An educational experience
【24h】

Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps using high-definition i-scan: An educational experience

机译:使用高清i-scan光学诊断结直肠息肉:教育经验

获取原文

摘要

AIM: To examine performances regarding prediction of polyp histology using high-definition (HD) i-scan in a group of endoscopists with varying levels of experience. METHODS: We used a digital library of HD i-scan still images, comprising twin pictures (surface enhancement and tone enhancement), collected at our university hospital. We defined endoscopic features of adenomatous and non-adenomatous polyps, according to the following parameters: color, surface pattern and vascular pattern. We familiarized the participating endoscopists on optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps using a 20-min didactic training session. All endoscopists were asked to evaluate an image set of 50 colorectal polyps with regard to polyp histology. We classified the diagnoses into high confidence (i.e., cases in which the endoscopist could assign a diagnosis with certainty) and low confidence diagnoses (i.e., cases in which the endoscopist preferred to send the polyp for formal histology). Mean sensitivity, specificity and accuracy per endoscopist/image were computed and differences between groups tested using independent-samples t tests. High vs low confidence diagnoses were compared using the paired-samples t test. RESULTS: Eleven endoscopists without previous experience on optical diagnosis evaluated a total of 550 images (396 adenomatous, 154 non-adenomatous). Mean sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for diagnosing adenomas were 79.3%, 85.7% and 81.1%, respectively. No significant differences were found between gastroenterologists and trainees regarding performances of optical diagnosis (mean accuracy 78.0% vs 82.9%, P = 0.098). Diminutive lesions were predicted with a lower mean accuracy as compared to non-diminutive lesions (74.2% vs 93.1%, P = 0.008). A total of 446 (81.1%) diagnoses were made with high confidence. High confidence diagnoses corresponded to a significantly higher mean accuracy than low confidence diagnoses (84.0% vs 64.3%, P = 0.008). A total of 319 (58.0%) images were evaluated as having excellent quality. Considering excellent quality images in conjunction with high confidence diagnosis, overall accuracy increased to 92.8%. CONCLUSION: After a single training session, endoscopists with varying levels of experience can already provide optical diagnosis with an accuracy of 84.0%.
机译:目的:在一组经验不同的内镜医师中,通过高清(HD)i扫描来检查有关息肉组织学预测的性能。方法:我们使用了高清i扫描静态图像的数字图书馆,其中包括在我们大学医院收集的两张图片(表面增强和色调增强)。我们根据以下参数定义了腺瘤性和非腺瘤性息肉的内窥镜特征:颜色,表面图案和血管图案。我们使用20分钟的教学培训课程使与会的内镜医师熟悉了大肠息肉的光学诊断。要求所有内镜医师评估息肉组织学方面的50个结直肠息肉的图像集。我们将诊断分为高置信度(即内镜医师可以确定诊断的病例)和低置信度诊断(即内镜医师更愿意将息肉送入正规组织学的病例)。计算每个内镜医师/图像的平均敏感性,特异性和准确性,并使用独立样本t检验测试各组之间的差异。使用配对样本t检验比较高置信度和低置信度诊断。结果:11位没有光学诊断经验的内镜医师共评估了550张图像(396例腺瘤,154例非腺瘤)。诊断腺瘤的平均敏感性,特异性和准确性分别为79.3%,85.7%和81.1%。肠胃科医生和受训人员之间在光学诊断方面没有发现显着差异(平均准确度为78.0%对82.9%,P = 0.098)。与非微小病变相比,预计微小病变的平均准确性较低(74.2%比93.1%,P = 0.008)。共有446例诊断结果(占81.1%)是高信度的。高置信度诊断对应的平均准确度明显高于低置信度诊断(84.0%对64.3%,P = 0.008)。总共319张(58.0%)图像被评估为具有出色的质量。考虑到高质量图像和高置信度诊断,总体准确性提高到92.8%。结论:在一次培训之后,具有不同经验水平的内镜医师已经可以提供光学诊断,其准确度为84.0%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号