...
首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Efficacy of mosapride plus proton pump inhibitors for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review
【24h】

Efficacy of mosapride plus proton pump inhibitors for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review

机译:莫沙必利加质子泵抑制剂治疗胃食管反流疾病的疗效:系统评价

获取原文

摘要

AIM: To assess the potential benefits of mosapride plus proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: A literature search was performed through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the ISI Web of Knowledge. The clinical trials that compared the benefit of mosapride plus PPI treatment with that of PPI monotherapy were analyzed. The rate of responders was evaluated by the pooled relative risk (PRR) and improvement in symptom scores was assessed by single effect size of a standardized mean, while Hedges’g was used as the effect size. Pooled effect sizes with 95%CIs were calculated using a fixed-effects model. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using Q test and I2 analyses. In addition, studies that assessed the additional efficacy of mosapride in PPI-resistant patients were also reviewed. RESULTS: This systematic review included information on a total of 587 patients based on 7 trials. Four trials compared the efficacy of combination therapy of mosapride plus a PPI with that of PPI monotherapy. The statistical analysis for the effect of additional mosapride showed equivocal results (PRR = 1.132; 95%CI: 0.934-1.372; P = 0.205; Hedges’g = 0.24; 95%CI: 0.03-0.46; P = 0.023). No heterogeneity and publication bias were found among the studies. Three open-labeled trials assessed the additional efficacy of mosapride in PPI-resistant patients. However, since these trials did not set the control group, the results may be considerably biased. CONCLUSION: Mosapride combined therapy is not more effective than PPI alone as first-line therapy. Whether it is effective in PPI-resistant patients needs to be determined.
机译:目的:评估莫沙必利和质子泵抑制剂(PPI)在治疗胃食管反流疾病中的潜在益处。方法:通过MEDLINE,EMBASE和ISI Web of Knowledge进行文献检索。分析了将莫沙必利加PPI治疗与PPI单药治疗的益处进行比较的临床试验。通过汇总相对危险度(PRR)评估缓解率,并通过标准化均值的单一效应量评估症状评分的改善,而使用Hedges’g作为效应量。使用固定效应模型计算95%CI的合并效应量。使用Q检验和I 2 分析评估研究之间的异质性。此外,还评估了评估莫沙必利对PPI耐药患者的其他疗效的研究。结果:这项系统评价包括基于7项试验的总共587例患者的信息。四个试验比较了莫沙必利加PPI与PPI单药联合治疗的疗效。对其他莫沙必利效果的统计分析显示出模棱两可的结果(PRR = 1.132; 95%CI:0.934-1.372; P = 0.205; Hedges'g = 0.24; 95%CI:0.03-0.46; P = 0.023)。在研究中未发现异质性和出版偏倚。两项开放性试验评估了莫沙必利对PPI耐药患者的其他疗效。但是,由于这些试验并未设置对照组,因此结果可能会有很大偏差。结论:莫沙必利联合治疗作为一线治疗并不比单独使用PPI有效。需要确定其对PPI耐药患者是否有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号