首页> 外文期刊>Procedia Computer Science >A Two-stage Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Paper-based and Software-based Business Cards
【24h】

A Two-stage Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Paper-based and Software-based Business Cards

机译:纸质名片和软件名片的两阶段比较生命周期评估

获取原文
           

摘要

We conduct a comparative life cycle assessment of two business card options: a smartphone software and the common paper- based alternative. Life cycle impacts of production, distribution and use of business cards were compared and contrasted for both systems. Given the prevalence and multifunctionality of digital devices and services, we analyze the environmental impacts of the two systems and evaluate their total energy consumption, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions and toxic releases by conducting a two-stage life cycle assessment with alternating functional units. The results indicate that, for a small-scale functional unit, the paper-based business card system causes slightly less environmental impact and has lower energy demand than the software-based (digital) business card system. Whereas when considering the more likely, large scale (real world scenario) functional unit, the digital business card system is more environmentally friendly and economical in terms of energy consumption. By comparing these two systems, this paper serves businesses and consumers when considering environmental consequences and energy depletion of their business networking options.
机译:我们对两种名片选项进行了生命周期比较评估:智能手机软件和基于纸张的常见替代品。比较和对比了两种系统的生产,分发和使用名片对生命周期的影响。考虑到数字设备和服务的普遍性和多功能性,我们将对这两个系统的环境影响进行分析,并通过使用交替的功能单元进行两阶段的生命周期评估,来评估它们的总能耗,温室气体(GHG)排放量和有毒物质释放量。结果表明,与基于软件的(数字)名片系统相比,基于纸质的名片系统对小型功能单元的环境影响较小,并且对能源的需求较低。考虑到更可能的大规模(实际情况)功能单元时,数字名片系统在能耗方面更环保,更经济。通过比较这两个系统,本文为企业和消费者提供了服务,它们在考虑环境后果和商业网络选择的能源消耗时为他们服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号