...
首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >Lithuanian Experience of Quantitative Evaluation of Socioeconomic Systems Position by Multicriteria Methods
【24h】

Lithuanian Experience of Quantitative Evaluation of Socioeconomic Systems Position by Multicriteria Methods

机译:多准则方法对立陶宛社会经济体系地位进行定量评估的经验

获取原文
           

摘要

Multicriteria evaluation methods were applied in Lithuania for the evaluation of construction projects by various aspects more than thirty years ago. It appeared to be a universal technique to reflect the condition of any socioeconomic system quantitatively. Such methods have been used successfully for such kind of problems solving for some tens of years, therefore it is significant to generalize the experience of many years and on its basis to bring to light problematic questions and those ones which should be solved.The critical analysis of the multicriteria evaluation stages revealed the following shortcomings. First, while forming the indexes list, it is a rare case when all possible sources are used. Second, the system of the examined expression indexes is formed on the ground of this list subjectively and without applying scientific methods. Third, the determination of indexes weights is incorrect, especially when a big number of indexes is evaluated. Fourth, there is no solution of the question what multicriteria evaluation method should be applied for a concrete problem solving.
机译:三十多年前,立陶宛采用多标准评估方法对建筑项目进行了评估。它似乎是一种普遍的技术,可以定量地反映任何社会经济系统的状况。此类方法已经成功用于解决此类问题数十年,因此总结多年经验并在此基础上揭示有问题的问题和应解决的问题具有重要意义。多标准评估阶段的结果表明存在以下缺陷。首先,在形成索引列表时,很少使用所有可能的来源。其次,基于该列表主观地形成了所检查的表达索引的系统,而不应用科学的方法。第三,索引权重的确定是不正确的,尤其是在评估大量索引时。第四,没有问题的解决方案,应采用哪种多准则评估方法来解决具体问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号