首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >Legal and Academic Issues of Higher Education Institutions in the Context of Work-based Learning: Latvian Case
【24h】

Legal and Academic Issues of Higher Education Institutions in the Context of Work-based Learning: Latvian Case

机译:基于工作学习的高校法律和学术问题:拉脱维亚案例

获取原文
           

摘要

The initial findings of the WBLQUAL Erasmus research project indicate that is accepted that a ‘culture gap’ and significant barriers exist between the worlds of academia and industry in a number of EU countries. These factors are most clearly expressed in the context of work-based learning, particularly when employees working in skilled jobs have a substantial base of knowledge and skills acquired through work experience and do not have a formal qualification (not necessary in relation to their employment) but aspire to have it. Employers also appear to require an educated workforce and have criticized higher education institutions for not adapting to their needs and being inflexible in their approach to work-based learning. The purpose of the research presented in the paper is to investigate and communicate some important aspects which can act as both a barrier to and an enabler of promotion of work-based learning in relation to higher education institutions. The findings are related to the specific situation of Latvia. The following main points are identified and examined in the research: a) the aspects of legislation that affect work-based learning, b) academic aspects in higher education institutions acting as barriers to and enablers of work- based learning from the point of view of three groups: senior management, faculty management, and practicing academics, and c) possible practical solutions for the facilitation of work-based learning. The main research methods used for research purposes are a study of legal acts regulating education in Latvia and their effect on work-based learning and conducting and analysing in-depth interviews with representatives of the three groups previously mentioned.
机译:WBLQUAL Erasmus研究项目的初步发现表明,许多欧盟国家的学术界和工业界之间存在“文化鸿沟”和重大障碍。这些因素在基于工作的学习中最清楚地表达出来,尤其是当从事熟练工作的员工具有通过工作经验获得的大量知识和技能并且没有正式资格(就其工作而言不是必需的)时但渴望拥有它。雇主似乎还需要受过良好教育的劳动力,并批评高等教育机构不能适应他们的需求,并且对基于工作的学习方法不灵活。本文中提出的研究的目的是调查和交流一些重要方面,这些方面既可以成为与高等教育机构有关的基于工作的学习的障碍,又可以促进基于工作的学习。调查结果与拉脱维亚的具体情况有关。在研究中确定并审查了以下要点:a)影响基于工作的学习的立法方面; b)从以下方面来看,作为阻碍和促进基于工作的学习的高等教育机构的学术方面:三类:高级管理人员,教师管理人员和实践学者,以及c)促进基于工作的学习的可行解决方案。用于研究目的的主要研究方法是研究拉脱维亚的规范教育的法律行为及其对以工作为基础的学习的影响,以及与上述三组代表进行的深入访谈的进行和分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号