首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >What is the Real-World CO 2 Reduction Benefit of the 95g/km Passenger Car Average Emission Target to be Reached by 2020?
【24h】

What is the Real-World CO 2 Reduction Benefit of the 95g/km Passenger Car Average Emission Target to be Reached by 2020?

机译:到2020年要实现的95g / km乘用车平均排放目标的减少现实二氧化碳排放量是多少?

获取原文
           

摘要

Road transport is responsible for roughly 20% of total Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Europe with passenger cars being a significant fraction. To control this, emission limits for CO 2 have been set, with the target is to reach 130g/km of CO 2 as an average for all new passenger cars in 2015. The medium-term target is to reach 95g/km average in 2020. These average values refer to CO 2 emission over the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC). This cycle has been recently considered to be misrepresenting actual driving conditions. Hence, a vehicle may emit significantly higher CO 2 emissions in real-world than it does over the NEDC. This paper aims at quantifying the impact in real-world CO 2 emissions by selecting different technology pathways to reach the 95g/km target. Along with a basecase scenario considering, three alternative scenarios were examined. The first scenario considers downsizing to smaller and more efficient diesel and gasoline cars. The second one assumes that hybrids will be the prime technology for emission reduction. The third scenario assumes that electrification will be the main technology pathway. The 95g/km target is reached in all scenarios. Results show that despite the statutory target is fixed, actual reductions over the basecase scenario differ. Electrification, downsizing, and hybridization scenarios achieve 3%, 4,1%, and 11% CO 2 reductions over the basecase new registrations in 2020, respectively. The average CO2 emission factor in the same order is 117, 116 and 108g/km. These results show that actual CO 2 reductions to be reached not only depend on the average CO 2 value agreed but also on the technology pathway selected. Conclusions were obtained under certain boundary conditions and by studying a limited suite of scenarios and technology pathways. However, our intention has been to demonstrate that real-world performance differs than statutory targets by offering a few examples. Such an approach, when further developed and adjusted to national circumstances, may be used to inform policy regarding the expected benefits of vehicle GHG regulation in view of wider targets, such as the 20-20-20 initiative.
机译:在欧洲,公路运输约占温室气体(GHG)排放总量的20%,其中乘用车占很大比例。为了控制这一点,已经设定了CO 2的排放限制,目标是到2015年所有新乘用车的平均CO 2排放量达到130g / km。中期目标是到2020年达到95g / km的平均值。这些平均值是指新欧洲行驶周期(NEDC)的CO 2排放量。最近已经认为该周期代表了实际的驾驶状况。因此,与NEDC相比,车辆在现实世界中可能会排放出更高的CO 2排放量。本文旨在通过选择达到95g / km目标的不同技术途径来量化对现实世界中CO 2排放的影响。除了考虑基本情况外,还研究了三种替代情况。第一种方案考虑将尺寸缩小到更小,更高效的柴油和汽油汽车。第二个假设混合动力将是减少排放的主要技术。第三种情况假设电气化将是主要的技术途径。在所有情况下均达到95g / km的目标。结果表明,尽管法定目标是固定的,但在基本案例中实际减少的金额却有所不同。电动化,小型化和混合化情景分别比2020年的基本案例新注册实现了3%,4.1%和11%的CO 2减少。同样的平均CO2排放因子是117、116和108g / km。这些结果表明,要实现的实际CO 2减少量不仅取决于商定的平均CO 2值,还取决于所选的技术途径。结论是在一定的边界条件下并通过研究有限的场景和技术途径获得的。但是,我们的意图是通过提供一些示例来证明实际绩效与法定目标有所不同。鉴于更广泛的目标(例如20-20-20倡议),这种方法在进一步发展并适应国情后,可用于指导有关车辆温室气体法规预期收益的政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号