...
首页> 外文期刊>Molecular and Cellular Biology >Selective DNA Binding and Association with the CREB Binding Protein Coactivator Contribute to Differential Activation of Alpha/Beta Interferon Genes by Interferon Regulatory Factors 3 and 7
【24h】

Selective DNA Binding and Association with the CREB Binding Protein Coactivator Contribute to Differential Activation of Alpha/Beta Interferon Genes by Interferon Regulatory Factors 3 and 7

机译:选择性DNA结合以及与CREB结合蛋白共激活剂的关联有助于通过干扰素调节因子3和7差异激活α/β干扰素基因。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Recent studies implicate the interferon (IFN) regulatory factors (IRF) IRF-3 and IRF-7 as key activators of the alpha/beta IFN (IFN-α/β) genes as well as the RANTES chemokine gene. Using coexpression analysis, the human IFNB, IFNA1, and RANTES promoters were stimulated by IRF-3 coexpression, whereas the IFNA4, IFNA7, and IFNA14 promoters were preferentially induced by IRF-7 only. Chimeric proteins containing combinations of different IRF-7 and IRF-3 domains were also tested, and the results provided evidence of distinct DNA binding properties of IRF-3 and IRF-7, as well as a preferential association of IRF-3 with the CREB binding protein (CBP) coactivator. Interestingly, some of these fusion proteins led to supraphysiological levels of IFN promoter activation. DNA binding site selection studies demonstrated that IRF-3 and IRF-7 bound to the 5′-GAAANNGAAANN-3′ consensus motif found in many virus-inducible genes; however, a single nucleotide substitution in either of the GAAA half-site motifs eliminated IRF-3 binding and transactivation activity but did not affect IRF-7 interaction or transactivation activity. These studies demonstrate that IRF-3 possesses a restricted DNA binding site specificity and interacts with CBP, whereas IRF-7 has a broader DNA binding specificity that contributes to its capacity to stimulate delayed-type IFN gene expression. These results provide an explanation for the differential regulation of IFN-α/β gene expression by IRF-3 and IRF-7 and suggest that these factors have complementary rather than redundant roles in the activation of the IFN-α/β genes.
机译:最近的研究表明,干扰素(IFN)调节因子(IRF)IRF-3和IRF-7是α/βIFN(IFN-α/β)基因以及RANTES趋化因子基因的关键激活因子。使用共表达分析,IRF-3共表达可刺激人IFNB,IFNA1和RANTES启动子,而IFNA4,IFNA7和IFNA14启动子仅优先由IRF-7诱导。还测试了包含不同IRF-7和IRF-3结构域组合的嵌合蛋白,结果提供了IRF-3和IRF-7独特的DNA结合特性的证据,以及IRF-3与CREB的优先结合结合蛋白(CBP)共激活因子。有趣的是,这些融合蛋白中的一些导致超生理水平的IFN启动子激活。 DNA结合位点选择研究表明,IRF-3和IRF-7结合了许多病毒诱导基因中发现的5'-GAAANNGAAANN-3'共有基序。但是,在任一GAAA半位点基序中进行单核苷酸取代均消除了IRF-3结合和反式激活活性,但不影响IRF-7相互作用或反式激活活性。这些研究表明,IRF-3具有受限的DNA结合位点特异性并与CBP相互作用,而IRF-7具有更广泛的DNA结合特异性,这有助于其刺激延迟型IFN基因表达的能力。这些结果为IRF-3和IRF-7对IFN-α/β基因表达的差异调节提供了解释,并表明这些因素在IFN-α/β基因的激活中具有互补而不是多余的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号