...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Executive Functions and Emotiona??Attention Interaction in Assessment of Brain Health: Reliability of Repeated Testing With Executive RT Test and Correlation With BRIEF-A Questionnaire
【24h】

Executive Functions and Emotiona??Attention Interaction in Assessment of Brain Health: Reliability of Repeated Testing With Executive RT Test and Correlation With BRIEF-A Questionnaire

机译:脑功能评估中的执行功能和情绪-注意交互作用:执行RT测试重复测试的可靠性以及与Brief-A问卷的相关性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Executive functions (EF) rely on intact fronto-subcortical networks. An insult, disorder or treatment compromising brain health may impair the functioning of these widespread networks and consequently disrupt EF. Changes in brain health due to treatment or disorder can be assessed by repeating an EF test at different time points, but practice effect may confound the results. In this study we examined reliability of repeated testing using a computer-based test of EF, Executive Reaction Time (RT) Test, that allows assessment of different executive functions and emotion–attention interaction. In addition, we investigated whether performance measures correlate with scores derived from a clinically validated questionnaire of executive functions, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Adult version (BRIEF-A). Healthy subjects performed the test twice, 3–4 weeks apart. When the entire tests were compared, subjects were faster and their odds to make an error reflecting disruption of working memory was lower in the second test. When two (error analysis) or four (RT analysis) blocks out of total eight test blocks were removed from the beginning of the test, the differences disappeared. In the first test emotional distractors prolonged RTs of younger, but not older, participants. In the second test emotional distractors had no effect on RTs of either age group. RTs correlated with Global Executive Composite score of BRIEF-A. Test–retest reliability analysis showed that the Executive RT Test is reliable in repeated testing with 0.83 intraclass correlation coefficient for RTs, 0.72 for total errors and 0.68 for working memory related errors. In summary, performance speed in the Executive RT Test correlate with subjective evaluations of executive functions and is reliable in repeated assessment when enough practice is ensured before the actual test. Thus, the Executive RT test holds promise as a potential indicator of brain health reflecting level of executive functions linked with daily life demands as well as typical emotion–attention interaction or possible aberrations in it.
机译:执行功能(EF)依赖完整的额下皮层网络。损害脑部健康的侮辱,障碍或治疗方法可能会损害这些广泛网络的功能,从而破坏EF。可以通过在不同时间点重复进行EF测试来评估由于治疗或疾病引起的脑部健康变化,但实践效果可能会混淆结果。在这项研究中,我们检查了使用基于计算机的EF测试(执行反应时间(RT)测试)进行重复测试的可靠性,该测试可以评估不同的执行功能和情绪-注意力互动。此外,我们调查了绩效指标是否与临床验证的执行功能问卷,执行功能行为评估量表,成人版(BRIEF-A)得出的分数相关。健康受试者两次进行测试,间隔3-4周。当比较整个测试时,在第二项测试中,受试者更快,他们犯错误反映工作记忆中断的几率更低。从测试开始删除八个测试块中的两个(错误分析)或四个(RT分析)时,差异消失了。在第一项测试中,情绪干扰者延长了年轻参与者(而非老参与者)的逆转录反应。在第二项测试中,情绪干扰对任何一个年龄段的RT均无影响。实时响应与Brief-A的全球执行综合评分相关。重测可靠性分析表明,执行RT测试在重复测试中是可靠的,RT的类内相关系数为0.83,总错误为0.72,工作内存相关错误为0.68。总而言之,Executive RT测试的性能速度与执行功能的主观评估相关,并且在实际测试之前确保有足够的实践时,在重复评估中是可靠的。因此,Executive RT测试有望将其作为大脑健康的潜在指标,反映出与日常生活需求相关的执行功能水平以及典型的情绪-注意互动或其中可能存在的畸变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号