...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >What Is the Correct Answer about The Dressa?? Colors? Investigating the Relation between Optimism, Previous Experience, and Answerability
【24h】

What Is the Correct Answer about The Dressa?? Colors? Investigating the Relation between Optimism, Previous Experience, and Answerability

机译:关于Dressa的正确答案是什么?颜色?研究乐观情绪,以前的经验和责任感之间的关系

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Dress photograph, first displayed on the internet in 2015, revealed stunning individual differences in color perception. The aim of this study was to investigate if lay-persons believed that the question about The Dress colors was answerable. Past research has found that optimism is related to judgments of how answerable knowledge questions with controversial answers are (Karlsson et al., 2016). Furthermore, familiarity with a question can create a feeling of knowing the answer (Reder and Ritter, 1992). Building on these findings, 186 participants saw the photo of The Dress and were asked about the correct answer to the question about The Dress’ colors (“blue and black,” “white and gold,” “other, namely…,” or “there is no correct answer”). Choice of the alternative “there is no correct answer” was interpreted as believing the question was not answerable. This answer was chosen more often by optimists and by people who reported they had not seen The Dress before. We also found that among participants who had seen The Dress photo before, 19%, perceived The Dress as “white and gold” but believed that the correct answer was “blue and black.” This, in analogy to previous findings about non-believed memories (Scoboria and Pascal, 2016), shows that people sometimes do not believe the colors they have perceived are correct. Our results suggest that individual differences related to optimism and previous experience may contribute to if the judgment of the individual perception of a photograph is enough to serve as a decision basis for valid conclusions about colors. Further research about color judgments under ambiguous circumstances could benefit from separating individual perceptual experience from beliefs about the correct answer to the color question. Including the option “there is no correct answer” may also be beneficial.
机译:2015年首次在互联网上显示的“连衣裙”照片揭示了色彩感知方面的惊人个体差异。这项研究的目的是调查外行人是否认为关于“着装颜色”的问题是否可以回答。过去的研究发现,乐观与判断具有争议性答案的可回答知识问题的方式有关(Karlsson等,2016)。此外,对问题的熟悉会产生一种知道答案的感觉(Reder and Ritter,1992)。基于这些发现,有186名参与者看到了《礼服》的照片,并被问到有关“礼服”颜色(“蓝色和黑色”,“白色和金色”,“其他,即……”或“没有正确的答案”)。选择“没有正确答案”的选择被解释为认为该问题不负责任。乐观主义者和报告他们以前从未看过《连衣裙》的人经常选择这个答案。我们还发现,在之前看过《着装》照片的参与者中,有19%的受访者认为“着装”为“白色和金色”,但认为正确答案是“蓝色和黑色”。类似于先前关于不可信记忆的发现(Scoboria和Pascal,2016),这表明人们有时不相信自己所感知的颜色是正确的。我们的结果表明,如果对照片的个人感知的判断足以作为色彩有效结论的决策基础,则与乐观和以前的经历有关的个体差异可能会有所助益。在模棱两可的情况下对颜色判断的进一步研究可能会受益于将个人的感知经验与对颜色问题的正确答案的信念区分开来。包括选项“没有正确答案”也可能是有益的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号