首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Do dimensional psychopathology measures relate to creative achievement or divergent thinking?
【24h】

Do dimensional psychopathology measures relate to creative achievement or divergent thinking?

机译:维度心理病理学措施与创造力或发散思维有关吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

Previous research provides disparate accounts of the putative association between creativity and psychopathology, including schizotypy, psychoticism, hypomania, bipolar disorder, ADHD, and autism spectrum disorders. To examine these association, healthy, non-clinical participants completed several psychopathology-spectrum measures, often postulated to associate with creativity: the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire, the Psychoticism scale, the Personality Inventory for DSM-5, the Hypomanic Personality Scale, the Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder scale, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Autism-Spectrum Quotient. The goal of Study 1 was to evaluate the factor structure of these dimensional psychopathology measures and, in particular, to evaluate the case for a strong general factor(s). None of the factor solutions between 1 and 10 factors provided a strong fit with the data based on the most commonly used metrics. The goal of Study 2 was to determine whether these psychopathology scales predict, independently, two measures of creativity: 1. a measure of participants' real-world creative achievements, and 2. divergent thinking, a laboratory measure of creative cognition. After controlling for academic achievement, psychoticism and hypomania reliably predicted real-world creative achievement and divergent thinking scored with the consensual assessment technique. None of the psychopathology-spectrum scales reliably predicted divergent thinking scored with the manual scoring method. Implications for the potential links between several putative creative processes and risk factors for psychopathology are discussed.
机译:先前的研究对创造力和精神病理学之间的推测联系提供了不同的解释,包括精神分裂症,精神病,轻躁狂,躁郁症,多动症和自闭症谱系障碍。为了检查这些关联,健康的非临床参与者完成了一些心理病理学频谱测量,通常被认为与创造力相关:精神分裂型人格问卷,精神病量表,DSM-5人格量表,低躁狂人格量表,注意缺陷/多动障碍量表,贝克抑郁量表和自闭症谱商。研究1的目的是评估这些维度心理病理学测量的因素结构,尤其是评估一个强大的一般因素的情况。 1到10个因子之间的因子解决方案均未提供与基于最常用指标的数据的强拟合。研究2的目的是确定这些心理病理学量表是否独立地预测创造力的两个指标:1.衡量参与者在现实世界中的创造成就的指标;以及2.发散思维,即对创造力认知的实验室指标。在控制了学业成绩之后,精神病和轻躁狂症可靠地预测了现实世界中的创造性成就,并且使用了自愿评估技术对发散的思维进行了评分。没有任何一种心理病理学光谱量表能够可靠地预测使用人工评分方法评分的发散思维。讨论了几种假定的创造性过程与心理病理风险因素之间潜在联系的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号