...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Mind Invasion: Situated Affectivity and the Corporate Life Hack
【24h】

Mind Invasion: Situated Affectivity and the Corporate Life Hack

机译:心灵入侵:情意与企业生活骇客

获取原文
           

摘要

In view of the philosophical problems that vex the debate on situated affectivity, it can seem wise to focus on simple cases. Accordingly, theorists often single out scenarios in which an individual employs a device in order to enhance their emotional experience, or to achieve new kinds of experience altogether, such as playing an instrument, going to the movies, or sporting a fancy handbag. I argue that this narrow focus on cases that fit a “user/resource model” tends to channel attention away from more complex and also more problematic instances of situated affectivity. Among these are scenarios in which a social domain draws individuals into certain modes of affective interaction, often by way of attunement and habituation to affective styles and interaction patterns that are normative in the domain in question. This can lead to a phenomenon that is not so much “mind extension” than “mind invasion”: affectivity is dynamically framed and modulated from without, often contrary to the prior orientations of the individuals in question. As an example, I discuss affective patterns prevalent in today's corporate workplace. I claim that workplace affect sometimes contributes to what is effectively a “hack” of employees' subjectivity.
机译:鉴于困扰情境情感问题的哲学问题,将重点放在简单的案例上似乎是明智的。因此,理论家经常会选择一个场景,在该场景中,个人使用一种设备来增强他们的情感体验,或者完全获得新的体验,例如弹奏乐器,看电影或运动手提包。我认为,对适用于“用户/资源模型”的案例的狭focus关注往往会将注意力从更复杂,也更有问题的情境实例上转移开来。在这些场景中,社交领域通常通过对特定领域中规范的情感样式和互动模式进行调教和习惯化,将个人吸引到某些情感互动模式中。这可能导致的现象与其说是“思想扩展”,不如说是“思想扩展”:情感的形成是动态构图和调节的,通常与所讨论的个体的先前取向背道而驰。例如,我讨论了当今公司工作场所中普遍存在的情感模式。我声称工作场所的影响有时会导致员工主观性的有效“破解”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号