首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Book Review: Corrupt Research: The Case for Reconceptualizing Empirical Management and Social Science
【24h】

Book Review: Corrupt Research: The Case for Reconceptualizing Empirical Management and Social Science

机译:书评:腐败研究:重新审视经验管理和社会科学的案例

获取原文
           

摘要

Raymond Hubbard documents the statistical, social, and philosophical causes of the “reproducibility crisis” in Corrupt Research: The Case for Reconceptualizing Empirical Management and Social Science. Hubbard's diagnosis of the reproducibility crisis includes a detailed critique of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST), in particular testing nil null hypotheses (hypotheses of “no difference”). His critique is supported by an almost exhaustive reference list, making Corrupt Research a useful text even if you are very familiar with the issue. Less familiar to readers may be his discussion of how the widespread tacit acceptance of a philosophically naive form of Hypothetico-Deductivism (HD) as the Scientific Method permits and exacerbates the other complementary causes. According to Hubbard, HD is erroneously thought to legitimize the inappropriate use of NHST and other methodological flaws.
机译:雷蒙德·哈伯德(Raymond Hubbard)在“腐败研究:重新认识经验管理和社会科学的案例”中记录了“可再现性危机”的统计,社会和哲学原因。哈伯德对可再现性危机的诊断包括对零假设假设检验(NHST)的详细评论,特别是对零个零假设(“无差异”假设)的检验。他的评论得到了几乎详尽的参考书的支持,即使您对问题很熟悉,Corrupt Research还是有用的文字。对于读者而言,可能不太熟悉的是他关于如何将科学上的天真假说-演绎主义(HD)的哲学天真形式广泛地默契地接受并加重了其他互补原因的讨论。根据哈伯德(Hubbard)的观点,错误地认为HD将不适当使用NHST和其他方法缺陷合法化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号