...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Production and Perception of Tone 3 Focus in Mandarin Chinese
【24h】

Production and Perception of Tone 3 Focus in Mandarin Chinese

机译:普通话音调3焦点的产生和感知

获取原文

摘要

This study uses production and perception experiments to explore tone 3 focus in Mandarin Chinese. Overall, contrastive focus in Mandarin is clearly marked with increased duration, intensity, and pitch range: in the experiments, listeners identified focused syllables correctly more than 90% of the time. However, a tone 3 syllable offers a smaller capacity for pitch range expansion under focus, and also yields less intensity increase; in addition, local dissimilation increases the duration, intensity, and pitch range of adjacent syllables within the same phrase as a focused tone 3 syllable. As a result, tone 3 focus was less well identified by listeners (77.1%). We suggest that the relatively poor identification of tone 3 focus is due to the smaller capacity for pitch range expansion, the confusion from within-phrase local dissimilatory effects, and the relatively weak intensity of tone 3. This study demonstrates that even within a language where purely prosodic marking of focus is clear, the location of prosodic focus can be difficult to identify in certain circumstances. Our results underline the conclusion, established in other work, that prosodic marking of focus is not universal, but is expressed through the prosodic system of each language.
机译:这项研究使用产生和感知实验来研究汉语普通话中的语调3重点。总体而言,普通话的对比重点明显地体现在持续时间,强度和音调范围的增加上:在实验中,听众在超过90%的时间内正确地识别了重点音节。但是,音调3的音节在聚焦下扩展音调范围的能力较小,并且强度的增加也较小。另外,局部异化增加了与集中音调3音节相同的短语中相邻音节的持续时间,强度和音高范围。结果,听众不太清楚音调3的重点(77.1%)。我们认为,音调3焦点的识别相对较差是由于音调范围扩展的能力较小,短语内部局部异化效应造成的混淆以及音调3的强度相对较弱。这项研究表明,即使在语言中,单纯的韵律焦点标记很明显,韵律焦点的位置在某些情况下可能难以识别。我们的结果强调了在其他工作中得出的结论,即重点的韵律标记不是普遍的,而是通过每种语言的韵律系统表达的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号