...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Attachment Security Balances Perspectives: Effects of Security Priming on Highly Optimistic and Pessimistic Explanatory Styles
【24h】

Attachment Security Balances Perspectives: Effects of Security Priming on Highly Optimistic and Pessimistic Explanatory Styles

机译:附件安全平衡的观点:安全启动对高度乐观和悲观的解释风格的影响

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Highly optimistic explanatory style (HOES) and highly pessimistic explanatory style (HPES) are two maladaptive ways to explain the world and may have roots in attachment insecurity. The current study aims to explore the effects of security priming – activating supportive representations of attachment security – on ameliorating these maladaptive explanatory styles. 57 participants with HOES and 57 participants with HPES were randomized into security priming and control conditions. Their scores of overall optimistic attribution were measured before and after priming. Security priming had a moderating effect: the security primed HOES group exhibited lower optimistic attribution, while the security primed HPES group evinced higher scores of optimistic attribution. Furthermore, the security primed HOES group attributed positive outcomes more externally, while the security primed HPES group attributed successful results more internally. The results support the application of security priming interventions on maladaptive explanatory styles. Its potential mechanism and directions for future study are also discussed.
机译:高度乐观的解释风格(HOES)和高度悲观的解释风格(HPES)是解释世界的两种不良适应方式,并且可能源于依恋不安全感。当前的研究旨在探讨安全启动(激活附件安全的支持表示)对改善这些适应不良的解释样式的影响。 57名有HOES的参与者和57名有HPES的参与者被随机分为安全启动和控制条件。在启动之前和之后测量他们的总体乐观归因得分。安全启动具有一定的调节作用:安全启动的HOES组表现出较低的乐观归因,而安全启动的HPES组则表现出较高的乐观归因。此外,由安全启动的HOES组在外部更积极地分配了积极的结果,而由安全启动的HPES组在内部更给成功的结果了。结果支持安全启动干预措施在不良适应性解释风格中的应用。还讨论了其潜在的机理和未来的研究方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号