首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Impulsivity, Impulsive and Reflective Processes and the Development of Alcohol Use and Misuse in Adolescents and Young Adults
【24h】

Impulsivity, Impulsive and Reflective Processes and the Development of Alcohol Use and Misuse in Adolescents and Young Adults

机译:冲动性,冲动性和反射性过程以及青少年使用和滥用酒精的发展

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper contrasts dual-process and personality approaches in the prediction of addictive behaviors and related risk behaviors. In dual-process models, behavior is described as the joint outcome of qualitatively different “impulsive” (or associative) and “reflective” processes. There are important individual differences regarding both types of processes, and the relative strength of both in a specific situation is influenced by prior behavior and state variables (e.g., fatigue, alcohol use). From this perspective, a specific behavior (e.g., alcohol misuse) can be predicted by the combined indices of the behavior-related impulsive processes (e.g., associations with alcohol), and reflective processes, including the ability to refrain from a motivationally salient action. Personality approaches have reported that general traits such as impulsivity predict addictive behaviors. Here we contrast these two approaches, with supplementary analyses on four datasets. We hypothesized that trait impulsivity can predict specific risky behaviors, but that its predictive power disappears once specific behavior-related associations, indicators of executive functioning, and their interaction are entered into the equation. In all four studies the observed interaction between specific associations and executive control (EC) was robust: trait impulsivity did not diminish the prediction of alcohol use by the interaction. Trait impulsivity was not always related to alcohol use, and when it was, the predictive power disappeared after entering the interaction between behavior-specific associations and EC in one study, but not in the other. These findings are interpreted in relation to the validity of the measurements used, which leads to a more refined hypothesis.
机译:本文对比了成瘾行为和相关风险行为的预测中的双重过程和人格方法。在双过程模型中,行为被描述为性质不同的“冲动”(或联想)和“反射”过程的联合结果。关于这两种类型的过程,存在重要的个体差异,并且在特定情况下两者的相对强度会受到先前行为和状态变量(例如,疲劳,饮酒)的影响。从这个角度来看,可以通过与行为相关的冲动过程(例如与酒精的联想)和反思过程的综合指数来预测一种特定的行为(例如,酗酒)和反思过程,包括避免动机上显着行为的能力。人格方法已报道冲动等一般特征可预测成瘾行为。在这里,我们对这两种方法进行了对比,并对四个数据集进行了补充分析。我们假设特质冲动可以预测特定的危险行为,但是一旦将与特定行为相关的关联,执行功能的指标及其相互作用输入等式,其预测能力就会消失。在所有四项研究中,观察到的特定联想与执行控制(EC)之间的相互作用是强有力的:特质冲动并不能减少相互作用对酒精使用的预测。在一项研究中,特质冲动并不总是与饮酒有关,而在一项研究中,进入行为特定联想与EC之间的相互作用后,预测能力消失了。这些发现与所用测量的有效性有关,这导致了更精确的假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号