首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Would you fund this movie? A reply to Fox et al. (2014)
【24h】

Would you fund this movie? A reply to Fox et al. (2014)

机译:你会资助这部电影吗?对福克斯等人的答复。 (2014年)

获取原文
           

摘要

We thank Fox et al. (2014) for their interest in our research and welcome this opportunity to respond to their commentary. They argue that participants in our studies enjoyed “just thinking” more than we claimed (Wilson et al., 2014). We found some irony in their position, because we began this line of research with a similar hypothesis. As the data came in we were surprised that participants did not enjoy deliberative thought very much, even when we went to some lengths to give them time to prepare and choose their topics (i.e., in our “prompted fantasy” conditions). We are thus in the rather amusing position of explaining why both Fox et al.'s interpretation and our initial hypotheses are wrong.
机译:我们感谢福克斯等。 (2014)感谢他们对我们研究的兴趣,并欢迎有此机会回应他们的评论。他们认为,我们研究的参与者比我们声称的更享受“公正思考”(Wilson等,2014)。我们发现他们的立场有些讽刺意味,因为我们从类似的假设开始了这一研究。随着数据的到来,我们感到惊讶的是,即使我们竭尽全力给他们时间准备和选择他们的主题(即在“提示性幻想”条件下),参与者也不怎么喜欢审议的思想。因此,我们处于非常有趣的位置,可以解释为什么Fox等人的解释和我们最初的假设都是错误的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号