...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Perceptual Learning and Feature-Based Approaches to Concepts a?? A Critical Discussion
【24h】

Perceptual Learning and Feature-Based Approaches to Concepts a?? A Critical Discussion

机译:感知学习和基于特征的概念方法批判性讨论

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A central challenge for any theory of concept learning comes from Fodor’s argument against the learning of concepts, which lies at the basis of contemporary computationalist accounts of the mind. Robert Goldstone and his colleagues propose a theory of perceptual learning that attempts to overcome Fodor’s challenge. Its main component is the addition of a cognitive device at the interface of perception and conception, which slowly builds “cognitive symbols” out of perceptual stimuli. Two main mechanisms of concept creation are unitization and differentiation. In this paper, I will present and examine their theory, and will show that two problems hinder this reply to Fodor’s challenge from being a successful answer to the challenge. To amend the theory, I will argue that one would need to say more about the input systems to unitization and differentiation, and be clearer on the representational format that they are able to operate upon. Until these issues have been addressed, the proposal does not deploy its full potential to threaten a Fodorian position.
机译:对于任何概念学习理论来说,一个中心挑战都来自于福多反对概念学习的观点,这是当代计算论者对思想的基础。罗伯特·戈德斯通(Robert Goldstone)和他的同事提出了一种感知学习理论,试图克服福多的挑战。它的主要组成部分是在感知和构想的界面处添加一个认知设备,该设备可以从感知刺激中缓慢构建“认知符号”。概念创建的两个主要机制是统一和差异化。在本文中,我将介绍和研究他们的理论,并表明有两个问题阻碍了对福多的挑战的答复成为对挑战的成功答案。为了修改该理论,我将争论一个问题,那就是需要更多地说明输入系统的统一化和差异化,并在它们能够操作的表示形式上更加明确。在解决这些问题之前,该提案不会充分发挥其威胁福多里立场的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号