首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Increases in Perspective Embedding Increase Reading Time Even with Typical Text Presentation: Implications for the Reading of Literature
【24h】

Increases in Perspective Embedding Increase Reading Time Even with Typical Text Presentation: Implications for the Reading of Literature

机译:透视的增加,即使使用典型的文本演示,也会增加阅读时间:对文学阅读的启示

获取原文
           

摘要

Reading fiction is a major component of intellectual life, yet it has proven difficult to study experimentally. One aspect of literature that has recently come to light is perspective embedding (“she thought I left” embedding her perspective on “I left”), which seems to be a defining feature of fiction. Previous work (Whalen et al., 2012) has shown that increasing levels of embedment affects the time that it takes readers to read and understand short vignettes in a moving window paradigm. With increasing levels of embedment from 1 to 5, reading times in a moving window paradigm rose almost linearly. However, level 0 was as slow as 3–4. Accuracy on probe questions was relatively constant until dropping at the fifth level. Here, we assessed this effect in a more ecologically valid (“typical”) reading paradigm, in which the entire vignette was visible at once, either for as long as desired (Experiment 1) or a fixed time (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, reading times followed a pattern similar to that of the previous experiment, with some differences in absolute speed. Accuracy matched previous results: fairly consistent accuracy until a decline at level 5, indicating that both presentation methods allowed understanding. In Experiment 2, accuracy was somewhat reduced, perhaps because participants were less successful at allocating their attention than they were during the earlier experiment; however, the pattern was the same. It seems that literature does not, on average, use easiest reading level but rather uses a middle ground that challenges the reader, but not too much.
机译:阅读小说是知识生活的重要组成部分,但事实证明,要通过实验来学习是困难的。最近发现的文学的一个方面是透视嵌入(“她以为我离开了”,将她的观点嵌入了“我离开了”),这似乎是小说的定义特征。以前的工作(Whalen等,2012)表明,嵌入水平的提高会影响读者阅读和理解移动窗口范式中的短渐晕花的时间。随着嵌入级别从1增加到5,在移动窗口范例中的阅读时间几乎呈线性增长。但是,级别0慢至3-4。探究题的准确性相对稳定,直到下降到第五级。在这里,我们在更具生态学意义的(“典型”)阅读范例中评估了这种效果,在该范例中,整个小插图可以在所需的时间(实验1)或固定的时间(实验2)中一次可见。在实验1中,读取时间遵循与先前实验类似的模式,但绝对速度有所不同。准确度与之前的结果相符:准确度一直保持一致,直到下降到第5级为止,表明这两种演示方法都可以理解。在实验2中,准确性有所降低,这可能是因为与之前的实验相比,参与者在分配注意力方面的成功度较低。但是,模式是相同的。平均而言,文学似乎并没有使用最简单的阅读水平,而是使用了一种挑战读者的中间立场,但并不过分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号