首页> 外文期刊>E3S Web of Conferences >Studies on Regional Green Development Based on Social Network Analysis
【24h】

Studies on Regional Green Development Based on Social Network Analysis

机译:基于社会网络分析的区域绿色发展研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Under the guidance of five development concepts, we should grasp regional overall economic, innovation, and traffic associated structure macroscopically, and analyze cities' status and role within the region when planning the regional green design. Through systematically considering regional overall structure, relationship between subjects and individual differences without prejudice to the ecological environment, it can play the greatest role of traffic led, city led, and market led, which can achieve regional green development. We build the traffic interaction network model, economic correlation network model, and innovation-driven network model to analyze network structures, identify key nodes and provide methodological guidance for regional green development plan. We bring Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration for the case study and draw the following conclusions. The traffic interaction network is closer than the economic correlation network and the innovation-driven network, and the economic correlation network is closer than the innovation-driven network. The three networks all have a high degree of centralization, which means there is a great difference among cities. Beijing, Tianjin, Shijiazhuang develop relatively well, however, Chengde, Hengshui and Zhangjiakou relatively fall behind. Dezhou has a foundation to promote transportation integration and lacks the economic momentum and innovation driven. Chengde should increase the degree of innovation and communication to build connection with other cities.
机译:在五个发展理念的指导下,我们应该宏观地把握区域整体经济,创新和交通相关结构,并在规划区域绿色设计时分析城市在区域内的地位和作用。在不影响生态环境的前提下,通过系统地考虑区域整体结构,主体与个体差异之间的关系,可以发挥交通主导,城市主导,市场主导的最大作用,实现区域绿色发展。我们建立交通互动网络模型,经济关联网络模型和创新驱动的网络模型,以分析网络结构,确定关键节点并为区域绿色发展计划提供方法指导。本文以京津冀城市群为例,得出以下结论。交通交互网络比经济关联网络和创新驱动网络更近,经济关联网络比创新驱动网络更近。这三个网络的高度集中化,这意味着城市之间存在很大的差异。北京,天津,石家庄的发展相对较好,但是承德,衡水和张家口相对落后。德州有促进交通一体化的基础,缺乏经济动力和创新驱动。承德市应提高创新和沟通水平,以与其他城市建立联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号