...
首页> 外文期刊>Emerging Infectious Diseases >Detecting Bioterror Attacks by Screening Blood Donors: A Best-Case Analysis
【24h】

Detecting Bioterror Attacks by Screening Blood Donors: A Best-Case Analysis

机译:通过筛查献血者发现生物恐怖袭击:最佳案例分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To assess whether screening blood donors could pro-vide early warning of a bioterror attack, we combined sto-chastic models of blood donation and the workings of bloodtests with an epidemic model to derive the probability distri-bution of the time to detect an attack under assumptionsfavorable to blood donor screening. Comparing the attackdetection delay to the incubation times of the most fearedbioterror agents shows that even under such optimisticconditions, victims of a bioterror attack would likely exhibitsymptoms before the attack was detected through blooddonor screening. For example, an attack infecting 100 per-sons with a noncontagious agent such as Bacillus anthraciswould only have a 26% chance of being detected within 25days; yet, at an assumed additional charge of $10 per test,donor screening would cost $139 million per year.Furthermore, even if screening tests were 99.99% specific,1,390 false-positive results would occur each year.Therefore, screening blood donors for bioterror agentsshould not be used to detect a bioterror attack
机译:为了评估筛查献血者是否可以提供生物恐怖袭击的预警,我们将献血的随机模型和验血工作与流行病模型相结合,得出检测到以下情况的时间的概率分布:有利于献血者筛选的假设。将攻击检测延迟与最担心的生物恐怖分子的潜伏时间进行比较表明,即使在这种乐观条件下,生物恐怖袭击的受害者在通过献血者筛查发现袭击之前也可能会出现症状。例如,用非传染性媒介(例如炭疽芽孢杆菌)感染每人100次攻击,在25天内只能检测到26%的机会;然而,假设每次检查额外收费10美元,则捐献者筛查每年将耗资1.39亿美元。此外,即使筛查测试具有99.99%的特异性,每年仍将发生1,390个假阳性结果。因此,应筛查献血者的生物恐怖分子。不用于检测生物恐怖袭击

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号