...
首页> 外文期刊>Investigative ophthalmology & visual science >Comparison of Two Methods to Measure Macular Pigment Optical Density in Healthy Subjects
【24h】

Comparison of Two Methods to Measure Macular Pigment Optical Density in Healthy Subjects

机译:两种测量健康受试者黄斑色素光密度的方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Purpose.: To evaluate and compare macular pigment optical density (MPOD) measurements obtained using the modified Heidelberg Retina Angiograph (HRA) and the Visucam 200. Methods.: Healthy young subjects were included in this prospective study. MPOD was measured with the modified HRA at 0?° and 0.5?°, 1?°, 2?°, and 6?° eccentricities from the fovea. The parameters obtained with the Visucam 200 (maximum, mean, area, and volume) were recorded the same day on the same subjects. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the agreement between the two devices. The repeatability and the reproducibility of each method were also assessed. Results.: Sixty-seven subjects were included whose median (interquartile ratio) age was 25 years (range, 23a??30 years). The MPODs as measured with the modified HRA were higher than those measured with the Visucam 200 (P 0.0001). The ICCs were low, ranging from 0.020 to 0.188. The correlation coefficients between the two methods were very low and ranged from 0.05 to 0.22. Repeatability and reproducibility were good with both methods, with ICCs ranging from 0.697 to 0.923. Conclusions.: Agreement between the modified HRA and the Visucam in measuring MPOD was rather low. These results suggest that the two methods are not interchangeable. Before using the Visucam 200 in clinical and research setting, further evaluation seems mandatory (http://ansm.sante.fr/ number, 2009-A00448-49).
机译:目的:为了评估和比较使用改良的海德堡视网膜血管造影仪(HRA)和Visucam 200获得的黄斑色素光密度(MPOD)测量结果。方法:该前瞻性研究包括健康的年轻受试者。用改良的HRA在距中央凹0°和0.5°,1°,2°和6°的偏心率下测量MPOD。使用Visucam 200获得的参数(最大,平均值,面积和体积)在同一天记录在同一受试者身上。类内相关系数(ICC)和相关系数用于评估两个设备之间的一致性。还评估了每种方法的可重复性和可重复性。结果:纳入了67名受试者,他们的中位(四分位比)年龄为25岁(范围为23a-30岁)。用改良的HRA测得的MPOD高于用Visucam 200测得的MPOD(P <0.0001)。 ICC较低,范围为0.020至0.188。两种方法之间的相关系数非常低,范围为0.05至0.22。两种方法的重复性和重现性均良好,ICC范围为0.697至0.923。结论:改良的HRA与Visucam在测量MPOD方面的一致性很低。这些结果表明这两种方法不可互换。在临床和研究环境中使用Visucam 200之前,似乎必须进行进一步评估(http://ansm.sante.fr/ number,2009-A00448-49)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号