...
首页> 外文期刊>Investigative ophthalmology & visual science >Assessment of Glaucomatous Optic Nerve Head Damage by Ophthalmology Residents Using Discus Software
【24h】

Assessment of Glaucomatous Optic Nerve Head Damage by Ophthalmology Residents Using Discus Software

机译:使用Discus软件评估眼科住院医生的青光眼视神经乳头损伤

获取原文
           

摘要

?Purpose?Discus is a freely accessible online software package that allows observers to assess their skills at interpreting non-stereoscopic optic disc photographs for signs of glaucomatous damage. The aim of this study was to validate Discus software and to establish reference data for performance and repeatability with Discus software in participants of a four-year Ophthalmic residency training program in Saudi Arabia. ?Methods?Fifty four residents participated in this study. All residents tested themselves three times over five days. The software display non-stereoscopic optic disc images, 80 images without evidence of repeatable visual field (VF) loss (VF negatives) and 20 with repeatable VF loss (VF positives), for up to 60 seconds. The software displays 2 VF positive and 24 VF negative images were repeated to asses consistency. Each observer will rate optic disc image on a 5-point scale (definitely healthy, probably healthy, not sure, probably damaged, definitely damaged). At the end of each test, online feedback was given to each participant. ?Results?The mean AUROC was 0.68, 0.68, 0.69 and 0.71 for first, second, third and fourth years residents respectively (p=0.04, Kruskal-Wallis test). The overall performance of residents was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.65, 0.74) compared to a panel of experts which was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.58, 0.96). Fourth years residents had the highest correlation with experts(r=0.64,p=0.02). There was no difference in the performance on the three repeated tests (P=0.6) with high degree of reliability (ICC=0.76). But there was more variability among junior residents which did not influence the mean performance (relationship between mean performance and mean difference in performance was -0.056, p=0.64). ?Conclusions?Senior residents had better performance and less variability on repeated tests compared to junior residents . Discus allows efficient and precise assessment of resident’s performance at assessing optic disc photographs in patients with glaucoma. ?View OriginalDownload Slide?Mean AUROC of three tests.?Mean AUROC of three tests.View OriginalDownload Slide ?.
机译:“目的” Discus是一个可免费访问的在线软件包,它使观察者可以评估他们在解释非立体视盘照片中是否存在青光眼损害迹象时的技能。这项研究的目的是在沙特阿拉伯一项为期四年的眼科住院医师培训计划的参与者中,验证Discus软件并为使用Discus软件的性能和可重复性建立参考数据。方法:54名居民参加了这项研究。所有居民在五天内对自己进行了三遍测试。该软件最多可显示60秒钟的非立体视盘图像,80幅无可重复视野(VF)损失证据(VF负片)和20幅可重复VF损失(VF正片)的图像。该软件重复显示2 VF正图像和24 VF负图像以评估一致性。每个观察者将以5分制对光盘图像进行评分(绝对健康,可能健康,不确定,可能损坏,肯定损坏)。每次测试结束时,都会向每个参与者提供在线反馈。结果第一,第二,第三和第四年居民的平均AUROC分别为0.68、0.68、0.69和0.71(p = 0.04,Kruskal-Wallis检验)。居民的整体表现为0.69(95%CI,0.65,0.74),而专家小组为0.79(95%CI,0.58,0.96)。四年级居民与专家的相关性最高(r = 0.64,p = 0.02)。可靠性高(ICC = 0.76)的三个重复测试(P = 0.6)的性能没有差异。但是,未成年人之间的差异较大,且不影响平均绩效(平均绩效与平均绩效差异之间的关系为-0.056,p = 0.64)。结论:与普通居民相比,高级居民在重复测试中表现更好,变异性更小。铁饼可以对青光眼患者的视盘照片进行评估时,对住院医师的表现进行高效,准确的评估。 “查看原始下载幻灯片”是三个测试的平均AUROC。“三个测试是平均AUROC”。查看“原始下载幻灯片”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号