...
首页> 外文期刊>IFAC PapersOnLine >Life lessons from and for distributed MPC – Part 2: Choice of decision makers
【24h】

Life lessons from and for distributed MPC – Part 2: Choice of decision makers

机译:来自分布式MPC的生命教训以及面向分布式MPC的生命教训–第2部分:决策者的选择

获取原文

摘要

This paper and an accompanying paper (McNamara et al., 2018) revisit the Distributed Predictive Control (DMPC) literature and seek to establish links with the social behaviour, focusing in particular on ways in which DMPC could be used to provide insights into the mechanisms of group regulation in social systems. It will be noted that there are major differences between the way in which DMPC algorithms and Social Human Participants (SHPs) form their respective decisions.Whereas in a first paper (McNamara et al., 2018) we concentrated on the dynamics of the cooperation and the weightings in the agents’ decision, the present paper extends the discussion to the arrangements in the group of decision makers. This paper concludes with some caveats as regards further analyses of social system using the methods proposed in these two papers.
机译:本文和随附的论文(McNamara等人,2018)重新审视了分布式预测控制(DMPC)文献,并寻求与社会行为建立联系,特别着重于可利用DMPC提供有关机制的见解的方法社会系统中的群体监管。值得注意的是,DMPC算法和社会人类参与者(SHP)形成各自决策的方式之间存在重大差异。而在第一篇论文(McNamara等人,2018年)中,我们着重讨论了合作的动态和在代理决策中的权重,本文将讨论扩展到决策者组中的安排。本文总结了使用这两篇​​论文提出的方法对社会系统进行进一步分析的一些警告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号