...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied and Environmental Microbiology >Removal and Transfer of Viruses on Food Contact Surfaces by Cleaning Cloths
【24h】

Removal and Transfer of Viruses on Food Contact Surfaces by Cleaning Cloths

机译:通过清洁布清除和转移食品接触表面上的病毒

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Contamination of food contact surfaces with pathogens is considered an important vehicle for the indirect transmission of food-borne diseases. Five different cleaning cloths were assessed for the ability to remove viruses from food contact surfaces (stainless steel surface and nonporous solid surface) and to transfer viruses back to these surfaces. Cleaning cloths evaluated include two different cellulose/cotton cloths, one microfiber cloth, one nonwoven cloth, and one cotton terry bar towel. Four viral surrogates (murine norovirus [MNV], feline calicivirus [FCV], bacteriophages PRD1 and MS2) were included. Removal of FCV from stainless steel was significantly greater (P ≤ 0.05) than that from nonporous solid surface, and overall removal of MNV from both surfaces was significantly less (P ≤ 0.05) than that of FCV and PRD1. Additionally, the terry towel removed significantly fewer total viruses (P ≤ 0.05) than the microfiber and one of the cotton/cellulose cloths. The cleaning cloth experiments were repeated with human norovirus. For transfer of viruses from cloth to surface, both cellulose/cotton cloths and microfiber transferred an average of 3.4 and 8.5 total PFU, respectively, to both surfaces, and the amounts transferred were significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) from those for the nonwoven cloth and terry towel (309 and 331 total PFU, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) in the amount of virus transfer between surfaces. These data indicate that while the cleaning cloths assessed here can remove viruses from surfaces, some cloths may also transfer a significant amount of viruses back to food contact surfaces.
机译:食物接触表面被病原体污染被认为是间接传播食源性疾病的重要媒介。评估了五种不同的清洁布从食物接触表面(不锈钢表面和无孔固体表面)清除病毒并将病毒转移回这些表面的能力。评估的清洁布包括两种不同的纤维素/棉布,一种超细纤维布,一种非织造布和一种棉质毛巾棒。包括四个病毒替代品(鼠诺如病毒[MNV],猫杯状病毒[FCV],噬菌体PRD1和MS2)。不锈钢中FCV的去除率要比无孔固体表面的去除率高(P≤0.05),两个表面上MNV的去除率要比FCV和PRD1去除率低得多(P≤0.05)。此外,与超细纤维和其中一种棉/纤维素布相比,毛圈毛巾去除的总病毒明显更少(P≤0.05)。用人诺如病毒重复清洁布实验。对于病毒从布到表面的转移,纤维素/棉布和超细纤维均平均将总PFU分别转移到两个表面,分别为3.4和8.5,并且转移量与无纺布的转移量显着不同(P≤0.05)。和毛巾布(分别为309和331 PFU)。表面之间的病毒转移量没有统计学上的显着差异(P> 0.05)。这些数据表明,尽管此处评估的清洁布可以清除表面上的病毒,但某些清洁布也可能会将大量病毒转移回食品接触表面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号