...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >The accuracy of transcranial Doppler in excluding intracranial hypertension following acute brain injury: a multicenter prospective pilot study
【24h】

The accuracy of transcranial Doppler in excluding intracranial hypertension following acute brain injury: a multicenter prospective pilot study

机译:经颅多普勒检查排除急性颅脑损伤后颅内高压的准确性:一项多中心前瞻性研究

获取原文

摘要

BackgroundUntimely diagnosis of intracranial hypertension may lead to delays in therapy and worsening of outcome. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) detects variations in cerebral blood flow velocity which may correlate with intracranial pressure (ICP). We investigated if intracranial hypertension can be accurately excluded through use of TCD. MethodThis was a multicenter prospective pilot study in patients with acute brain injury requiring invasive ICP (ICPi) monitoring. ICP estimated with TCD (ICPtcd) was compared with ICPi in three separate time frames: immediately before ICPi placement, immediately after ICPi placement, and 3?hours following ICPi positioning. Sensitivity and specificity, and concordance correlation coefficient between ICPi and ICPtcd were calculated. Receiver operating curve (ROC) and the area under the curve (AUC) analyses were estimated after measurement averaging over time. ResultsA total of 38 patients were enrolled, and of these 12 (31.6%) had at least one episode of intracranial hypertension. One hundred fourteen paired measurements of ICPi and ICPtcd were gathered for analysis. With dichotomized ICPi (≤20?mmHg vs >20?mmHg), the sensitivity of ICPtcd was 100%; all measurements with high ICPi (>20?mmHg) also had a high ICPtcd values.Bland-Altman plot showed an overestimation of 6.2?mmHg (95% CI 5.08–7.30?mmHg) for ICPtcd compared to ICPi. AUC was 96.0% (95% CI 89.8–100%) and the estimated best threshold was at ICPi of 24.8?mmHg corresponding to a sensitivity 100% and a specificity of 91.2%. ConclusionsThis study provides preliminary evidence that ICPtcd may accurately exclude intracranial hypertension in patients with acute brain injury. Future studies with adequate power are needed to confirm this result.
机译:背景颅内高压的不及时诊断可能导致治疗延迟和预后恶化。经颅多普勒(TCD)检测脑血流速度的变化,该变化可能与颅内压(ICP)相关。我们调查了是否可以通过使用TCD准确排除颅内高压。方法这是一项针对需要侵入式ICP(ICPi)监测的急性脑损伤患者的多中心前瞻性研究。在三个独立的时间范围内,将通过TCD(ICPtcd)估算的ICP与ICPi进行比较:紧接在ICPi放置之前,紧接在ICPi放置之后以及放置ICPi 3小时之后。计算了ICPi和ICPtcd之间的敏感性和特异性,以及一致性相关系数。在对测量值进行时间平均后,估算接收器工作曲线(ROC)和曲线下面积(AUC)。结果共有38例患者入选,其中12例(31.6%)患有颅内高压至少1次。收集了ICPi和ICPtcd的一百一十四对测量值进行分析。使用二等分的ICPi(≤20?mmHg vs> 20?mmHg),ICPtcd的灵敏度为100%;所有具有较高ICPi(> 20?mmHg)的测量结果也具有较高的ICPtcd值。与ICPi相比,Bland-Altman图显示ICPtcd高估了6.2?mmHg(95%CI 5.08–7.30?mmHg)。 AUC为96.0%(95%CI为89.8–100%),估计最佳阈值为ICPi为24.8?mmHg,对应于100%的敏感性和91.2%的特异性。结论本研究提供了初步证据,ICPtcd可以准确排除急性脑损伤患者的颅内高压。需要有足够能力的未来研究来证实这一结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号