首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing mortality in pre-hospital tracheal intubation to emergency department intubation in trauma patients
【24h】

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing mortality in pre-hospital tracheal intubation to emergency department intubation in trauma patients

机译:对创伤患者院前气管插管与急诊科插管的死亡率进行比较的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundPre-hospital endotracheal intubation is frequently used for trauma patients in many emergency medical systems. Despite a wide range of publications in the field, it is debated whether the intervention is associated with a favourable outcome, when compared to more conservative airway measures. MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted to identify interventional and observational studies where the mortality rates of adult trauma patients undergoing pre-hospital endotracheal intubation were compared to those undergoing emergency department intubation. ResultsTwenty-one studies examining 35,838 patients were included. The median mortality rate in patients undergoing pre-hospital intubation was 48% (range 8–94%), compared to 29% (range 6–67%) in patients undergoing intubation in the emergency department. Odds ratios were in favour of emergency department intubation both in crude and adjusted mortality, with 2.56 (95% CI: 2.06, 3.18) and 2.59 (95% CI: 1.97, 3.39), respectively. The overall quality of evidence is very low. Twelve of the twenty-one studies found a significantly higher mortality rate after pre-hospital intubation, seven found no significant differences, one found a positive effect, and for one study an analysis of the mortality rate was beyond the scope of the article. ConclusionsThe rationale for wide and unspecific indications for pre-hospital intubation seems to lack support in the literature, despite several publications involving a relatively large number of patients. Pre-hospital intubation is a complex intervention where guidelines and research findings should be approached cautiously. The association between pre-hospital intubation and a higher mortality rate does not necessarily contradict the importance of the intervention, but it does call for a thorough investigation by clinicians and researchers into possible causes for this finding.
机译:背景技术在许多紧急医疗系统中,创伤前患者经常使用院前气管插管。尽管在该领域有大量出版物,但与较保守的气道措施相比,该干预是否与良好的预后相关仍存在争议。方法进行系统的文献检索,以识别介入和观察性研究,比较接受住院气管插管的成人创伤患者与急诊插管的成人创伤患者的死亡率。结果共纳入21项研究,检查了35838例患者。接受急诊插管的患者中位死亡率为48%(8-94%),相比之下,急诊插管患者的中位死亡率为29%(6-67%)。毛病率和急诊死亡率均有利于急诊插管,分别为2.56(95%CI:2.06、3.18)和2.59(95%CI:1.97、3.39)。证据的整体质量非常低。二十一项研究中的十二项发现院前插管后的死亡率显着更高,七项没有发现显着差异,一项发现有积极作用,而一项研究对死亡率的分析超出了本文的范围。结论尽管有许多涉及相对大量患者的出版物,但对于院前插管的广泛和非特异性适应症的理论依据似乎缺乏文献支持。院前插管是一项复杂的干预措施,应谨慎对待指南和研究结果。院前插管与较高死亡率之间的关联并不一定与干预的重要性相抵触,但确实需要临床医生和研究人员对这一发现的可能原因进行彻底调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号