...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >Anidulafungin compared with fluconazole in severely ill patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: Support for the 2009 IDSA treatment guidelines for candidiasis
【24h】

Anidulafungin compared with fluconazole in severely ill patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: Support for the 2009 IDSA treatment guidelines for candidiasis

机译:重度念珠菌血症和其他形式的侵袭性念珠菌病患者中阿尼芬净与氟康唑的比较:支持2009 IDSA念珠菌治疗指南

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

IntroductionDuring the past decade, the incidence of Candida infections in hospitalized patients has increased, with fluconazole being the most commonly prescribed systemic antifungal agent for these infections. However, the 2009 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) candidiasis guidelines recommend an echinocandin for the treatment of candidemia/invasive candidiasis in patients who are considered to be "moderately severe or severely" ill. To validate these guidelines, clinical trial data were reviewed.MethodsA secondary analysis of data from a previously published prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was performed; it compared anidulafungin with fluconazole for the treatment of invasive candidiasis and candidemia. Patients with critical illness were identified at study entry by using the following criteria: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score of ≥ 15, evidence of severe sepsis (sepsis and one or more end-organ dysfunctions) present, and/or patient was in intensive care. Global response rates were compared at the end of intravenous study treatment (the primary end point of the original study) and all-cause mortality at 14 and 28 days from study entry in this group.ResultsThe patients (163 (66.5%) of 245) fulfilled at least one criterion for critical illness (anidulafungin, n = 89; fluconazole, n = 74). No significant differences were found in baseline characteristics between the two treatment groups. The global response rate was 70.8% for anidulafungin and 54.1% for fluconazole (P = 0.03; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0 to 31.5); all-cause mortality was 10.1% versus 20.3% at 14 days (P = 0.08; 95% CI, -0.9 to 21.3) and was 20.2% versus 24.3% at 28 days (P = 0.57; 95% CI, -8.8 to 17.0) for anidulafungin and fluconazole, respectively.ConclusionsIn this post hoc analysis, anidulafungin was more effective than fluconazole for treatment of severely ill patients with candidemia, thus supporting the 2009 IDSA guidelines.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00058682.
机译:简介在过去十年中,住院患者念珠菌感染的发生率有所增加,氟康唑是这些感染最常用的全身性抗真菌药。但是,《 2009年美国传染病学会(IDSA)念珠菌病指南》建议使用棘皮菌素治疗被认为是“中度或重度”疾病的患者的念珠菌病/侵袭性念珠菌病。为了验证这些指导原则,对临床试验数据进行了回顾。方法对先前发表的一项前瞻性,随机,双盲临床试验的数据进行了二次分析。它比较了阿尼芬净与氟康唑治疗侵袭性念珠菌病和念珠菌血症的方法。在进入研究时,通过使用以下标准识别出危重病患者:急性生理和慢性健康评估(APACHE)II得分≥15,表明存在严重败血症(败血症和一种或多种终末器官功能障碍)的证据,和/或病人正在重症监护。比较了静脉注射研究治疗结束时(原始研究的主要终点)的总体缓解率和进入研究组后第14天和第28天的全因死亡率。结果患者(245例中的163例(66.5%))至少符合一项危重疾病标准(阿尼芬净,n = 89;氟康唑,n = 74)。两个治疗组之间的基线特征没有发现显着差异。阿尼芬净和氟康唑的总体缓解率为70.8%,氟康唑的总体缓解率为54.1%(P = 0.03; 95%的置信区间(CI):2.0至31.5);全因死亡率在14天时为10.1%,而在2天时为20.3%(P = 0.08; 95%CI,-0.9至21.3);在28天时,其全因死亡率是20.2%,而相比于24.3%(P = 0.57; 95%CI,-8.8至17.0)结论在本事后分析中,阿尼芬净在重症念珠菌血症重症患者中比氟康唑更有效,因此支持了2009 IDSA指南.Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00058682。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号