首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients
【24h】

Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients

机译:实时超声引导颈内静脉置管:与重症监护患者标志性技术的前瞻性比较

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionCentral venous cannulation is crucial in the management of the critical care patient. This study was designed to evaluate whether real-time ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein is superior to the standard landmark method.MethodsIn this randomised study, 450 critical care patients who underwent real-time ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein were prospectively compared with 450 critical care patients in whom the landmark technique was used. Randomisation was performed by means of a computer-generated random-numbers table, and patients were stratified with regard to age, gender, and body mass index.ResultsThere were no significant differences in gender, age, body mass index, or side of cannulation (left or right) or in the presence of risk factors for difficult venous cannulation such as prior catheterisation, limited sites for access attempts, previous difficulties during catheterisation, previous mechanical complication, known vascular abnormality, untreated coagulopathy, skeletal deformity, and cannulation during cardiac arrest between the two groups of patients. Furthermore, the physicians who performed the procedures had comparable experience in the placement of central venous catheters (p = non-significant). Cannulation of the internal jugular vein was achieved in all patients by using ultrasound and in 425 of the patients (94.4%) by using the landmark technique (p < 0.001). Average access time (skin to vein) and number of attempts were significantly reduced in the ultrasound group of patients compared with the landmark group (p < 0.001). In the landmark group, puncture of the carotid artery occurred in 10.6% of patients, haematoma in 8.4%, haemothorax in 1.7%, pneumothorax in 2.4%, and central venous catheter-associated blood stream infection in 16%, which were all significantly increased compared with the ultrasound group (p < 0.001).ConclusionThe present data suggest that ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein in critical care patients is superior to the landmark technique and therefore should be the method of choice in these patients.
机译:简介中央静脉插管对于重症监护患者的治疗至关重要。本研究旨在评估实时超声引导下颈内静脉插管是否优于标准界标方法。方法在这项随机研究中,对450名接受实时超声引导下颈内静脉插管的重症监护患者前瞻性与450例使用了标志性技术的重症监护患者进行了比较。通过计算机生成的随机数表进行随机分组,并根据年龄,性别和体重指数对患者进行分层。结果性别,年龄,体重指数或插管侧面无显着差异(左或右)或存在静脉插管困难的风险因素,例如先前的导管插入,尝试进入的部位有限,导管插入期间的先前困难,先前的机械并发症,已知的血管异常,未治疗的凝血病,骨骼畸形和心脏骤停期间的插管两组患者之间。此外,执行该程序的医生在中央静脉导管的放置方面具有可比的经验(p =不重要)。通过超声检查,所有患者均完成了颈内静脉插管术,使用地标技术在425例患者中(94.4%)实现了颈内静脉插管术(p <0.001)。与标志性组相比,超声组的平均进入时间(皮肤至静脉)和尝试次数显着减少(p <0.001)。在具有里程碑意义的组中,颈动脉穿刺的发生率为10.6%,血肿为8.4%,血胸为1.7%,气胸为2.4%,中心静脉导管相关的血流感染为16%,均显着增加与超声检查组相比(p <0.001)。结论目前的数据表明,在重症监护患者中超声引导颈内静脉置管术优于标志性技术,因此应成为这些患者的选择方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号