Objective :To obseive the efficacy of real‐time ultrasound‐guided bedside internal jugular vein catheteriza‐tion in critically ill patients .Methods :63 cases of critically ill patients were randomized into tow groups :real‐time guided internal jugular cannulation cases in group U (n=33) and anatomic landmark guided cases in group A (n=30) . Compared the success rate and the first puncture success rate of catheterization ,the number of attempts for successful catheterization ,the time spent for successful and arising complications .between group U and group A .Results:There were no significant differences in the demographic features between the two groups (P> 0 .05) .The success rate and the first puncture success rate of catheterization were significant higher in group U than in group A (P<0 .05) .The number of attempts for successful catheterization was satistically lower in group U than in group A (P<0 .01) .And ar‐terial punction complication was increased significantly in group A (P<0 .05) .Conclusion:Bedside internal jugular vein catheterization guided by real‐time ultrasound was superior to by anatomic landmark in critically ill patients .%目的:探讨实时超声引导用于危重症患者床旁颈内静脉置管术可行性。方法:手术室外需要颈内静脉置管的危重症患者63例,随机分入实时超声引导组(U组,n=33)、体表解剖标志定位组(A组,n=30)。比较两种方法引导颈内静脉穿刺的总成功率、一次成功率、穿刺次数、穿刺时间及并发症。结果:超声引导组总成功率和一次成功率均高于体表解剖定位组(P<0.05),穿刺次数和穿刺时间均少于体表解剖定位组(P<0.01),误穿动脉发生率低于体表解剖定位组(P<0.05)。结论:实时超声引导重症患者床旁颈内静脉置管优于体表解剖定位法,安全可行。
展开▼