首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Chemistry: Journal of the American Association for Clinical Chemists >Rate immunonephelometry and radial immunodiffusion compared for apolipoproteins AI and B assay.
【24h】

Rate immunonephelometry and radial immunodiffusion compared for apolipoproteins AI and B assay.

机译:载脂蛋白AI和B分析比较速率免疫比浊法和放射免疫扩散法。

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We measured apolipoproteins (apo) AI and B in fresh plasma samples and serum control pools by using two rate immunonephelometric assay (INA) methods (Beckman "Array" and Behring) and radial immunodiffusion (RID). Both INA methods on average gave apoAI values similar to those by RID in fresh plasma samples. The coefficients of correlation for the two INA-RID method pairs were as follows: Beckman INA vs RID, n = 94, r = 0.73; and Behring INA vs RID, n = 112, r = 0.66. The bias between the INA and RID methods was reflected reasonably well by either lyophilized or frozen control pools. For apoB, the Beckman INA measurements in fresh plasma averaged 40% lower than RID values, due almost entirely to the values assigned to calibration sera, but results by the two methods were highly correlated (n = 94, r = 0.93). The Behring INA values for fresh plasma averaged only 13% lower than RID values, but the two methods were less well correlated (n = 112, r = 0.74). Frozen control pools were most suitable for apoB analysis.
机译:我们使用两种速率免疫比浊法(INA)方法(贝克曼“阵列”和贝林)和放射免疫扩散法(RID)测量了新鲜血浆样品和血清对照库中的载脂蛋白(apo)AI和B。两种INA方法的平均apoAI值均与新鲜血浆样品中的RID相似。两对INA-RID方法对的相关系数如下:Beckman INA与RID,n = 94,r = 0.73; n = 94,r = 0.73。和Behring INA vs RID,n = 112,r = 0.66。冻干或冷冻对照池可以很好地反映INA和RID方法之间的偏差。对于apoB,贝克曼INA在新鲜血浆中的测量结果平均比RID值低40%,这几乎完全归因于分配给校准血清的值,但两种方法的结果高度相关(n = 94,r = 0.93)。新鲜血浆的Behring INA值平均仅比RID值低13%,但两种方法的相关性较低(n = 112,r = 0.74)。冷冻对照池最适合apoB分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号