...
首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Cancer >Effects of preset sequential administrations of sunitinib and everolimus on tumour differentiation in Caki-1 renal cell carcinoma
【24h】

Effects of preset sequential administrations of sunitinib and everolimus on tumour differentiation in Caki-1 renal cell carcinoma

机译:预设舒尼替尼和依维莫司顺序给药对Caki-1肾细胞癌肿瘤分化的影响

获取原文

摘要

Background: Sunitinib (VEGFR/PDGFR inhibitor) and everolimus (mTOR inhibitor) are both approved for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) as first-line and second-line therapy, respectively. In the clinics, sunitinib treatment is limited by the emergence of acquired resistance, leading to a switch to second-line treatment at progression, often based on everolimus. No data have been yet generated on programmed alternating sequential strategies combining alternative use of sunitinib and everolimus before progression. Such strategy is expected to delay the emergence of acquired resistance and improve tumour control. The aim of our study was to assess the changes in tumours induced by three different sequences administration of sunitinib and everolimus. Methods: In human Caki-1 RCC xenograft model, sunitinib was alternated with everolimus every week, every 2 weeks, or every 3 weeks. Effects on necrosis, hypoxia, angiogenesis, and EMT status were assessed by immunohisochemistry and immunofluorescence. Results: Sunitinib and everolimus programmed sequential regimens before progression yielded longer median time to tumour progression than sunitinib and everolimus monotherapies. In each group of treatment, tumour growth control was associated with inhibition of mTOR pathway and changes from a mesenchymal towards an epithelial phenotype, with a decrease in vimentin and an increase in E-cadherin expression. The sequential combinations of these two agents in a RCC mouse clinical trial induced antiangiogenic effects, leading to tumour necrosis. Conclusions: In summary, our study showed that alternate sequence of sunitinib and everolimus mitigated the development of mesenchymal phenotype compared with sunitinib as single agent.
机译:背景:舒尼替尼(VEGFR / PDGFR抑制剂)和依维莫司(mTOR抑制剂)均被批准分别用于晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)一线和二线治疗。在临床中,舒尼替尼的治疗受到获得性耐药性的出现的限制,导致在进展时转用二线治疗,通常基于依维莫司。尚无关于程序化交替顺序策略的数据,该策略在进展前将舒尼替尼和依维莫司交替使用已合并使用。预期这种策略将延迟获得性耐药的出现并改善肿瘤控制。我们研究的目的是评估舒尼替尼和依维莫司的三种不同序列给药所诱导的肿瘤变化。方法:在人类Caki-1 RCC异种移植模型中,舒尼替尼每周,每2周或每3周交替使用依维莫司。通过免疫组织化学和免疫荧光评估对坏死,缺氧,血管生成和EMT状态的影响。结果:与舒尼替尼和依维莫司单药治疗相比,舒尼替尼和依维莫司编程的序贯治疗方案在进展之前产生更长的中位肿瘤进展时间。在每组治疗中,肿瘤生长的控制与mTOR通路的抑制和从间质向上皮表型的变化有关,波形蛋白的减少和E-钙粘蛋白的表达增加。在RCC小鼠临床试验中,这两种药物的顺序组合可诱导抗血管生成作用,导致肿瘤坏死。结论:总的来说,我们的研究表明,与舒尼替尼单药相比,舒尼替尼和依维莫司的交替序列减轻了间充质表型的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号