...
首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Cancer >Long-term survival of advanced triple-negative breast cancers with a dose-intense cyclophosphamide/anthracycline neoadjuvant regimen
【24h】

Long-term survival of advanced triple-negative breast cancers with a dose-intense cyclophosphamide/anthracycline neoadjuvant regimen

机译:剂量密集的环磷酰胺/蒽环类新辅助方案对晚期三阴性乳腺癌的长期生存

获取原文

摘要

Background: Triple-negative (TN) breast cancers exhibit major initial responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but generally have a poor outcome. Because of the lack of validated drug targets, chemotherapy remains an important therapeutic tool in these cancers.Methods: We report the survival of two consecutive series of 267 locally advanced breast cancers (LABC) treated with two different neoadjuvant regimens, either a dose-dense and dose-intense cyclophosphamide–anthracycline (AC) association (historically called SIM) or a conventional sequential association of cyclophosphamide and anthracycline, followed by taxanes (EC-T). We compared pathological responses and survival rates of these two groups and studied their association with tumours features.Results: Although the two regimens showed equivalent pathological complete response (pCR) in the whole population (16 and 12%), the SIM regimen yielded a non-statistically higher pCR rate than EC-T (48% vs 24%, P =0.087) in TN tumours. In the SIM protocol, DFS was statistically higher for TN than for non-TN patients ( P =0.019), although we showed that the TN status was associated with an increased initial risk of recurrence in both regimens. This effect gradually decreased and after 2 years, TN was associated with a significantly decreased likelihood of relapse in SIM-treated LABC (hazard ratio (HR)=0.25 (95% CI: 0.07–0.86), P =0.028).Conclusions: AC dose intensification treatment is associated with a very favourable long-term survival rate in TN breast cancers. These observations call for a prospective assessment of such dose-intense AC-based regimens in locally advanced TN tumours.
机译:背景:三阴性(TN)乳腺癌对新辅助化疗表现出主要的初始反应,但总体效果较差。由于缺乏经过验证的药物靶点,化学疗法仍然是这些癌症中的重要治疗工具。方法:我们报道了用两种不同的新辅助方案治疗的连续两个系列的267例局部晚期乳腺癌(LABC)的存活率,这两种方法都是剂量密集的剂量密集的环磷酰胺-蒽环(AC)关联(历史上称为SIM)或环磷酰胺和蒽环的常规顺序结合,然后是紫杉烷(EC-T)。我们比较了这两组的病理反应和生存率,并研究了它们与肿瘤特征的关系。结果:尽管两种方案在整个人群中均表现出相同的病理完全缓解(pCR)(16%和12%),但SIM方案却没有-在TN肿瘤中,pCR率比EC-T高(48%比24%,P = 0.087)。在SIM方案中,TN的DFS统计学上高于非TN的患者(P = 0.019),尽管我们表明TN的状态与两种方案中复发的初始风险均增加有关。这种作用逐渐减弱,两年后,TN与SIM治疗的LABC复发可能性显着降低有关(危险比(HR)= 0.25(95%CI:0.07-0.86),P = 0.028)。剂量强化治疗与TN乳腺癌非常有利的长期生存率相关。这些观察结果要求对局部晚期TN肿瘤中此类剂量密集的基于AC的方案进行前瞻性评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号