首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Fiscal rules, powerful levers for controlling the health budget? Evidence from 32 OECD countries
【24h】

Fiscal rules, powerful levers for controlling the health budget? Evidence from 32 OECD countries

机译:财政规则,控制卫生预算的强大杠杆?来自32个经合组织国家的证据

获取原文
           

摘要

Publicly funded healthcare forms an intricate part of government spending in most Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, because of its reliance on entitlements and dedicated revenue streams. The impact of budgetary rules and procedures on publicly funded health care might thus be different from other spending categories. In this study we focus on the potential of fiscal rules to contain these costs and their design features. We assess the relationship between fiscal rules and the level of public health care expenditure of 32 (OECD) countries between 1985 and 2014. Our dataset consists of health care expenditure data of the OECD and data on fiscal rules of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for that same period. Through a multivariate regression analysis, we estimate the association between fiscal rules and its subcategories and inflation adjusted public health care expenditure. We control for population, Gross Domestic Product (GDP), debt and whether countries received an IMF bailout for the specific period. In all our regressions we include country and year fixed effects. The presence of a fiscal rule on average is associated with a 3 % reduction of public health care expenditure. Supranational balanced budget rules are associated with some 8 % lower expenditure. Health service provision-oriented countries with more passive purchasing structures seem less capable of containing costs through fiscal rules. Fiscal rules demonstrate lagged effectiveness; the potential for expenditure reduction increases after one and two years of fiscal rule implementation. Finally, we find evidence that fiscal frameworks that incorporate multi-year expenditure ceilings show additional potential for cost control. Our study shows that there seems a clear relationship between the potential of fiscal rules and budgeting health expenses. Using fiscal rules to contain the level of health care expenditure can thus be a necessary precondition for successful strategies for cost control.
机译:在大多数经济合作与发展组织(OECD)国家中,政府资助的医疗保健构成了政府支出的复杂组成部分,因为它依赖于应享权利和专用的收入来源。因此,预算规则和程序对公共资助的卫生保健的影响可能不同于其他支出类别。在这项研究中,我们重点研究了可能包含这些成本及其设计特征的财政规则。我们评估了1985年至2014年间财政规则与32个(OECD)国家的公共医疗保健支出水平之间的关系。我们的数据集包括OECD的医疗保健支出数据和国际货币基金组织(IMF)的财政规则数据在同一时期。通过多元回归分析,我们估计了财政规则及其子类别与通货膨胀调整后的公共卫生保健支出之间的关联。我们控制人口,国内生产总值(GDP),债务以及在特定时期内各国是否接受了IMF的救助。在所有回归分析中,我们都包含了国家和年份固定影响。平均而言,制定财政规则可以减少3%的公共卫生保健支出。超国家预算平衡规则使支出减少了约8%。具有被动采购结构的面向卫生服务提供的国家似乎没有能力通过财政规则控制成本。财政规则显示了滞后的有效性;在实施了一年和两年的财政规则后,减少支出的潜力增加了。最后,我们发现有证据表明,包含多年支出上限的财政框架显示了成本控制的其他潜力。我们的研究表明,财政规则的潜力与预算卫生支出之间似乎存在明确的关系。因此,使用财政规则来控制医疗保健支出的水平可能是成功实施成本控制策略的必要先决条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号