首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >A comparison of 10 accelerometer non-wear time criteria and logbooks in children
【24h】

A comparison of 10 accelerometer non-wear time criteria and logbooks in children

机译:儿童10种加速度计非佩戴时间标准和日志的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

There are many unresolved issues regarding data reduction algorithms for accelerometry. The choice of criterion for removal of non-wear time might have a profound influence on physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (SED) estimates. The aim of the present study was to compare 10 different non-wear criteria and a log of non-wear periods in 11-year-old children. Children from the Active Smarter Kids study performed 7-days of hip-worn accelerometer monitoring (Actigraph GT3X+) and logged the number of non-wear periods each day, along with the approximate duration and reason for non-wear. Accelerometers were analyzed using 10 different non-wear criteria: ≥ 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, and 90?min of consecutive zero counts without allowance for interruptions, and ≥60 and 90?min with allowance for 1 and 2?min of interruptions. 891 children provided 5203 measurement days, and reported 1232 non-wear periods ranging from 0 to 3 periods per day: on most days children reported no non-wear periods (77.1% of days). The maximum number of non-wear periods per day was 2 for the 90-min criterion, 3 to 5 for most criteria, 7 for the 20-min criterion, and 20 for the 10-min criterion. The non-wear criteria influenced overall PA (mean values across all criteria: 591 to 649?cpm; 10% difference) and SED time (461 to 539?min/day; 17% difference) estimates, especially for the most prolonged SED bouts. Estimates were similar for time spent in intensity-specific (light, moderate, vigorous, and moderate-to-vigorous) PA, but varied 6–9% among the non-wear criteria for proportions of time spent in intensity-specific PA (% of total wear time). Population level estimates of PA and SED differed between different accelerometer non-wear criteria, meaning that non-wear time algorithms should be standardized across studies to reduce confusion and improve comparability of children’s PA level. Based on the numbers and reasons for non-wear periods, we suggest a 45 or 60-min consecutive zero count-criterion not allowing any interruptions to be applied in future pediatric studies, at least for children older than 10?years. The study is registered in Clinicaltrials.gov with identification number NCT02132494 . Registered 7 April 2014.
机译:关于用于加速计的数据缩减算法,存在许多未解决的问题。选择消除非佩戴时间的标准可能会对体育锻炼(PA)和久坐时间(SED)的估计产生深远影响。本研究的目的是比较11岁儿童的10种不同的非佩戴标准和非佩戴时间记录。来自Active Smarter Kids研究的孩子进行了7天的髋部加速计监测(Actigraph GT3X +),并记录了每天的不佩戴次数,以及大概的佩戴时间和不佩戴原因。使用10种不同的非磨损标准对加速度计进行了分析:≥10、20、30、45、60和90?min的连续零计数(不允许中断),≥60和90?min的允许1和2?min的中断。 891名儿童提供了5203天的测量天数,并报告了1232次非佩戴时间段,每天介于0到3个周期之间;在大多数日子里,儿童报告没有非佩戴时间段(占天的77.1%)。每天的最大不佩戴次数是90分钟标准为2次,大多数标准为3至5次,20分钟标准为7次,10分钟标准为20次。非磨损标准会影响总PA(所有标准的均值:591至649?cpm;相差10%)和SED时间(461至539?min /天;相差17%)估计值,尤其是对于最长时间的SED发作。对于强度特定的(轻度,中度,剧烈和中度至剧烈)PA所花费的时间的估算值相似,但在非磨损标准中,强度特定的PA中所花费的时间比例的变化范围为6–9%(%总磨损时间)。在不同的加速度计非佩戴标准之间,对PA和SED的总体水平估计有所不同,这意味着跨研究应将非佩戴时间算法标准化,以减少混乱并提高儿童PA水平的可比性。根据不戴眼镜的次数和原因,我们建议连续45或60分钟的零计数标准,不允许至少在10岁以上的儿童中进行任何儿科研究。该研究已在Clinicaltrials.gov中注册,标识号为NCT02132494。 2014年4月7日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号