首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Using latent class analysis to develop a model of the relationship between socioeconomic position and ethnicity: cross-sectional analyses from a multi-ethnic birth cohort study
【24h】

Using latent class analysis to develop a model of the relationship between socioeconomic position and ethnicity: cross-sectional analyses from a multi-ethnic birth cohort study

机译:使用潜在类别分析建立社会经济地位与种族之间关系的模型:来自多种族出生队列研究的横断面分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Almost all studies in health research control or investigate socioeconomic position (SEP) as exposure or confounder. Different measures of SEP capture different aspects of the underlying construct, so efficient methodologies to combine them are needed. SEP and ethnicity are strongly associated, however not all measures of SEP may be appropriate for all ethnic groups. Methods We used latent class analysis (LCA) to define subgroups of women with similar SEP profiles using 19 measures of SEP. Data from 11,326 women were used, from eight different ethnic groups but with the majority from White British (40%) or Pakistani (45%) backgrounds, who were recruited during pregnancy to the Born in Bradford birth cohort study. Results Five distinct SEP subclasses were identified in the LCA: (i) "Least socioeconomically deprived and most educated" (20%); (ii) "Employed and not materially deprived" (19%); (iii) "Employed and no access to money" (16%); (iv) "Benefits and not materially deprived" (29%) and (v) "Most economically deprived" (16%). Based on the magnitude of the point estimates, the strongest associations were that compared to White British women, Pakistani and Bangladeshi women were more likely to belong to groups: (iv) "benefits and not materially deprived" (relative risk ratio (95% CI): 5.24 (4.44, 6.19) and 3.44 (2.37, 5.00), respectively) or (v) most deprived group (2.36 (1.96, 2.84) and 3.35 (2.21, 5.06) respectively) compared to the least deprived class. White Other women were more than twice as likely to be in the (iv) "benefits and not materially deprived group" compared to White British women and all ethnic groups, other than the Mixed group, were less likely to be in the (iii) "employed and not materially deprived" group than White British women. Conclusions LCA allows different aspects of an individual’s SEP to be considered in one multidimensional indicator, which can then be integrated in epidemiological analyses. Ethnicity is strongly associated with these identified subgroups. Findings from this study suggest a careful use of SEP measures in health research, especially when looking at different ethnic groups. Further replication of these findings is needed in other populations.
机译:背景几乎所有健康研究中的研究都以暴露或混杂因素的形式控制或调查社会经济地位(SEP)。 SEP的不同度量方法捕获了基础结构的不同方面,因此需要有效的方法来结合它们。 SEP和种族紧密相关,但是,并非所有SEP指标都适用于所有种族。方法我们使用潜在类别分析(LCA),使用19种SEP量度来定义具有相似SEP特征的女性亚组。使用了来自八个不同种族的11,326名妇女的数据,但大多数来自白人英国人(40%)或巴基斯坦人(45%)背景,这些妇女是在怀孕期间招募到布拉德福德出生人群研究的。结果在LCA中确定了五个不同的SEP亚类:(i)“社会经济地位最差和受教育程度最低的人”(20%); ii“被雇用但未被实质剥夺”(19%); iii“受雇且无钱”(16%); (iv)“受益但未被实质剥夺”(29%)和(v)“经济上最剥夺”(16%)。根据得分估计的幅度,最强的关联是,与白人英国妇女相比,巴基斯坦和孟加拉国妇女更有可能属于以下群体:(iv)“受益但并未受到实质剥夺”(相对危险度(95%CI ):分别为5.24(4.44,6.19)和3.44(2.37,5.00))或(v)最贫困的群体(分别为2.36(1.96,2.84)和3.35(2.21,5.06))。与其他白人白人妇女相比,其他白人妇女在(iv)“福利而不是物质上被剥夺的群体”中的可能性要高出一倍以上,除混合群体外,所有其他种族的可能性都较小(iii) “就业而不是物质上被剥夺”的群体要比英国白人妇女多。结论LCA可以在一个多维指标中考虑个人SEP的不同方面,然后可以将其整合到流行病学分析中。种族与这些确定的亚组密切相关。这项研究的结果表明,在健康研究中应谨慎使用SEP措施,尤其是在研究不同种族群体时。在其他人群中需要进一步复制这些发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号