首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Why physicians and nurses ask (or don’t) about partner violence: a qualitative analysis
【24h】

Why physicians and nurses ask (or don’t) about partner violence: a qualitative analysis

机译:为什么医生和护士问(或不问)伴侣暴力:定性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Intimate partner violence (IPV) against women is a serious public health issue and is associated with significant adverse health outcomes. The current study was undertaken to: 1) explore physicians’ and nurses’ experiences, both professional and personal, when asking about IPV; 2) determine the variations by discipline; and 3) identify implications for practice, workplace policy and curriculum development. Methods Physicians and nurses working in Ontario, Canada were randomly selected from recognized discipline-specific professional directories to complete a 43-item mailed survey about IPV, which included two open-ended questions about barriers and facilitators to asking about IPV. Text from the open-ended questions was transcribed and analyzed using inductive content analysis. In addition, frequencies were calculated for commonly described categories and the Fisher’s Exact Test was performed to determine statistical significance when examining nurse/physician differences. Results Of the 931 respondents who completed the survey, 769 (527 nurses, 238 physicians, four whose discipline was not stated) provided written responses to the open-ended questions. Overall, the top barriers to asking about IPV were lack of time, behaviours attributed to women living with abuse, lack of training, language/cultural practices and partner presence. The most frequently reported facilitators were training, community resources and professional tools/protocols/policies. The need for additional training was a concern described by both groups, yet more so by nurses. There were statistically significant differences between nurses and physicians regarding both barriers and facilitators, most likely related to differences in role expectations and work environments. Conclusions This research provides new insights into the complexities of IPV inquiry and the inter-relationships among barriers and facilitators faced by physicians and nurses. The experiences of these nurses and physicians suggest that more supports (e.g., supportive work environments, training, mentors, consultations, community resources, etc.) are needed by practitioners. These findings reflect the results of previous research yet offer perspectives on why barriers persist. Multifaceted and intersectoral approaches that address individual, interpersonal, workplace and systemic issues faced by nurses and physicians when inquiring about IPV are required. Comprehensive frameworks are needed to further explore the many issues associated with IPV inquiry and the interplay across these issues.
机译:背景技术对妇女的亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是一个严重的公共卫生问题,与严重的不良健康后果相关。当前的研究旨在:1)在询问IPV时,探索医生和护士的专业和个人经验; 2)按纪律确定变化; 3)确定对实践,工作场所政策和课程开发的影响。方法从加拿大公认的特定专业目录中随机选择在加拿大安大略省工作的医师和护士,以完成关于IPV的43项邮件调查,其中包括两个有关IPV的障碍和促进者的开放性问题。使用归纳式内容分析来记录和分析来自开放式问题的文本。此外,还对常用类别的频率进行了计算,并在检查护士/医师差异时进行了Fisher精确检验以确定统计显着性。结果在完成调查的931名受访者中,有769名(527名护士,238名医生,其中四名未注明学科)对开放式问题作了书面答复。总体而言,询问IPV的主要障碍是时间不足,归咎于遭受虐待的妇女的行为,缺乏培训,语言/文化习俗和伴侣的存在。报道最频繁的推动者是培训,社区资源和专业工具/协议/政策。两组都描述了需要额外培训的问题,而护士则更是如此。护士和医生之间在障碍和促进者方面存在统计学上的显着差异,最有可能与角色期望和工作环境的差异有关。结论这项研究为IPV查询的复杂性以及医师和护士面临的障碍和促进者之间的相互关系提供了新的见解。这些护士和医生的经验表明,从业人员需要更多的支持(例如,支持性的工作环境,培训,导师,咨询,社区资源等)。这些发现反映了先前研究的结果,但提供了障碍持续存在的原因的观点。需要多方面和跨部门的方法来解决护士和医生在询问IPV时面临的个人,人际关系,工作场所和系统性问题。需要一个综合的框架来进一步探索与IPV查询相关的许多问题以及这些问题之间的相互作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号