...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Disparities in obesity among rural and urban residents in a health disparate region
【24h】

Disparities in obesity among rural and urban residents in a health disparate region

机译:卫生状况不同地区的城乡居民之间的肥胖差异

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background The burden of obesity and obesity-related conditions is not borne equally and disparities in prevalence are well documented for low-income, minority and rural adults in the United States. The current literature on rural versus urban disparities is largely derived from national surveillance data which may not reflect regional nuances. There is little practical research that supports the reality of local service providers such as county health departments that may serve both urban and rural residents in a given area. Conducted through a community-academic partnership, the primary aim of this study is to quantify the current levels of obesity (BMI), fruit and vegetable (FV) intake and physical activity (PA) in a predominately rural health disparate region. Secondary aims are to determine if a gradient exists within the region in which rural residents have poorer outcomes on these indicators compared to urban residents. Methods Conducted as part of a larger ongoing community-based participatory research (CBPR) initiative, data were gathered through a random digit dial telephone survey using previously validated measures (n?=?784). Linear, logistic and quantile regression models are used to determine if residency (i.e. rural, urban) predicts outcomes of FV intake, PA and BMI. Results The majority (72%) of respondents were overweight (BMI?=?29?±?6?kg/m2), with 29% being obese. Only 9% of residents met recommendations for FV intake and 38% met recommendations for PA. Statistically significant gradients between urban and rural and race exist at the upper end of the BMI distribution. In other words, the severity of obesity is worse among black compared to white and for urban residents compared to rural residents. Conclusions These results will be used by the community-academic partnership to guide the development of culturally relevant and sustainable interventions to increase PA, increase FV intake and reduce obesity within this health disparate region. In particular, local stakeholders may wish to address disparities in BMI by allocating resources to the vulnerable groups identified.
机译:背景技术肥胖症和与肥胖症有关的疾病的负担不能平等地承担,并且在美国,低收入,少数民族和农村成年人的患病率有充分的文献记载。当前关于农村与城市差距的文献主要来自国家监测数据,这些数据可能无法反映出地区差异。很少有实践研究支持本地服务提供商的现实,例如可以为给定地区的城乡居民提供服务的县卫生部门。通过社区与学术界的伙伴关系进行的这项研究的主要目的是量化在农村地区健康差异很大的地区当前的肥胖(BMI),水果和蔬菜(FV)摄入量以及身体活动(PA)水平。次要目标是确定与城市居民相比,农村居民在这些指标上的结果较差的区域内是否存在梯度。方法作为正在进行的一项较大的基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)计划的一部分,通过使用先前已验证的措施通过随机数字拨号电话调查收集数据(n?=?784)。线性,逻辑和分位数回归模型用于确定居住地(即农村,城市)是否预测FV摄入,PA和BMI的结果。结果大部分(72%)的受访者超重(BMI?=?29?±?6?kg / m 2 ),其中29%为肥胖。只有9%的居民符合FV摄入量推荐标准,而38%的居民符合PA推荐标准。在BMI分布的最高端,存在城乡之间和种族之间的统计上显着的梯度。换句话说,与白人相比,黑人肥胖的严重程度要比白人高,而与农村居民相比,城市居民的肥胖更严重。结论社区-学术伙伴关系将使用这些结果来指导文化上相关且可持续的干预措施的开发,以增加该卫生领域不同地区的PA,增加FV摄入量并减少肥胖。特别是,当地利益相关者可能希望通过将资源分配给确定的弱势群体来解决BMI中的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号