首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care
【24h】

Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care

机译:解释人群通过初级保健成功进行的大型体育锻炼试验的覆盖面

获取原文
           

摘要

Failure to include socio-economically deprived or ethnic minority groups in physical activity (PA) trials may limit representativeness and could lead to implementation of interventions that then increase health inequalities. Randomised intervention trials often have low recruitment rates and rarely assess recruitment bias. A previous trial by the same team using similar methods recruited 30% of the eligible population but was in an affluent setting with few non-white residents and was limited to those over 60?years of age. PACE-UP is a large, effective, population-based walking trial in inactive 45-75?year-olds that recruited through seven London general practices. Anonymised practice demographic data were available for all those invited, enabling investigation of inequalities in trial recruitment. Non-participants were invited to complete a questionnaire. From 10,927 postal invitations, 1150 (10.5%) completed baseline assessment. Participation rate ratios (95% CI), adjusted for age and gender as appropriate, were lower in men 0.59 (0.52, 0.67) than women, in those under 55 compared with those ≥65, 0.60 (0.51, 0.71), in the most deprived quintile compared with the least deprived 0.52 (0.39, 0.70) and in Asian individuals compared with whites 0.62 (0.50, 0.76). Black individuals were equally likely to participate as white individuals. Participation was also associated with having a co-morbidity or some degree of health limitation. The most common reasons for non-participation were considering themselves as being too active or lack of time. Conducting the trial in this diverse setting reduced overall response, with lower response in socio-economically deprived and Asian sub-groups. Trials with greater reach are likely to be more expensive in terms of recruitment and gains in generalizability need to be balanced with greater costs. Differential uptake of successful trial interventions may increase inequalities in PA levels and should be monitored. ISRCTN.com ISRCTN98538934 . Registered 2nd March 2012.
机译:未能在体育活动(PA)试验中纳入社会经济剥夺者或少数民族群体可能会限制代表性,并可能导致实施干预措施,进而加剧健康不平等现象。随机干预试验通常招募率低,很少评估招募偏倚。同一团队先前使用类似方法进行的试验招募了30%的合格人群,但生活环境富裕,非白人居民很少,并且仅限于60岁以上的人群。 PACE-UP是一项大型的,有效的,以人群为基础的步行试验,适用于通过七个伦敦常规活动招募的不活跃的45-75岁年龄段的人。匿名的实践人口统计学数据可用于所有受邀者,从而能够调查试验招募中的不平等现象。邀请非参与者填写问卷。从10,927个邮政邀请中,有1150(10.5%)个完成了基线评估。年龄和性别(经适当调整)的参与率(95%CI)在男性(女性)中低于女性(55岁以下)为0.59(0.52,0.67),而≥65、0.60(0.51、0.71)的男性则最低。被剥夺的五分位数与被剥夺最少的0.52(0.39,0.70)相比,在亚洲的个人与白人被剥夺的0.62(0.50,0.76)相比。黑人和白人一样有可能参加。参与还与合并症或某种程度的健康限制有关。不参与的最常见原因是认为自己过于活跃或缺乏时间。在这种多样化的环境中进行试验会降低总体反应,而在社会经济贫困的亚洲人群中反应却较低。就招募而言,范围更广的试验可能会更昂贵,而推广性的提高必须与更高的成本相平衡。成功采用不同的试验干预措施可能会增加PA水平的不平等,因此应进行监测。 ISRCTN.com ISRCTN98538934。 2012年3月2日注册。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号