首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Study protocol: developing a decision system for inclusive housing: applying a systematic, mixed-method quasi-experimental design
【24h】

Study protocol: developing a decision system for inclusive housing: applying a systematic, mixed-method quasi-experimental design

机译:研究方案:开发包容性住房的决策系统:应用系统的混合方法准实验设计

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Identifying the housing preferences of people with complex disabilities is a much needed, but under-developed area of practice and scholarship. Despite the recognition that housing is a social determinant of health and quality of life, there is an absence of empirical methodologies that can practically and systematically involve consumers in this complex service delivery and housing design market. A rigorous process for making effective and consistent development decisions is needed to ensure resources are used effectively and the needs of consumers with complex disability are properly met. Methods/Design This 3-year project aims to identify how the public and private housing market in Australia can better respond to the needs of people with complex disabilities whilst simultaneously achieving key corporate objectives. First, using the Customer Relationship Management framework, qualitative (Nominal Group Technique) and quantitative (Discrete Choice Experiment) methods will be used to quantify the housing preferences of consumers and their carers. A systematic mixed-method, quasi-experimental design will then be used to quantify the development priorities of other key stakeholders (e.g., architects, developers, Government housing services etc.) in relation to inclusive housing for people with complex disabilities. Stakeholders randomly assigned to Group 1 (experimental group) will participate in a series of focus groups employing Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) methodology. Stakeholders randomly assigned to Group 2 (control group) will participate in focus groups employing existing decision making processes to inclusive housing development (e.g., Risk, Opportunity, Cost, Benefit considerations). Using comparative stakeholder analysis, this research design will enable the AHP methodology (a proposed tool to guide inclusive housing development decisions) to be tested. Discussion It is anticipated that the findings of this study will enable stakeholders to incorporate consumer housing preferences into commercial decisions. Housing designers and developers will benefit from the creation of a parsimonious set of consumer-led housing preferences by which to make informed investments in future housing?and contribute to future housing policy. The research design has not been applied in the Australian research context or elsewhere, and will provide a much needed blueprint for market investment to develop viable, consumer directed inclusive housing options for people with complex disability.
机译:背景技术识别复杂残疾人的住房偏好是非常需要的,但实践和奖学金领域尚不完善。尽管人们认识到住房是健康和生活质量的社会决定因素,但仍缺乏经验方法来切实和系统地使消费者参与这个复杂的服务提供和住房设计市场。需要制定严格而有效的一致决策的过程,以确保有效地利用资源并适当满足残障消费者的需求。方法/设计这项为期3年的项目旨在确定澳大利亚的公共和私人住房市场如何更好地满足残障人士的需求,同时实现关键的公司目标。首先,将使用“客户关系管理”框架,使用定性(名义组技术)和定量(离散选择实验)方法来量化消费者及其护理人员的住房偏好。然后将采用系统的混合方法,准实验设计来量化其他关键利益相关者(例如建筑师,开发商,政府住房服务等)在为残疾人提供包容性住房方面的发展重点。随机分配给第1组(实验组)的利益相关者将参加采用分析层次过程(AHP)方法的一系列焦点组。随机分配到第2组(控制组)的利益相关者将参加采用现有决策程序进行包容性住房开发(例如,风险,机会,成本,收益考虑)的焦点小组。使用利益相关者的比较分析,该研究设计将使AHP方法论(指导包容性住房开发决策的拟议工具)能够得到测试。讨论预期该研究的结果将使利益相关者能够将消费者住房偏好纳入商业决策。住房设计师和开发商将从一系列以消费者为主导的住房优惠中受益,从而在未来的住房中进行明智的投资,并为未来的住房政策做出贡献。该研究设计尚未在澳大利亚的研究背景或其他地方得到应用,它将为市场投资提供迫切需要的蓝图,以为复杂的残疾人开发可行的,消费者导向的包容性住房选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号