首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Measles transmission from an anthroposophic community to the general population, Germany 2008
【24h】

Measles transmission from an anthroposophic community to the general population, Germany 2008

机译:麻疹从人智社区传播到普通民众,德国2008

获取原文
           

摘要

Background In Germany, measles vaccination coverage with two doses is not yet sufficient to prevent regional outbreaks. Among the 16 German federal states, vaccination coverage was lowest in Bavaria with 85% in 2008. From March to mid-April 2008, four neighbouring Bavarian counties reported 55 measles-cases mostly linked to an ongoing measles outbreak in an anthroposophic school in Austria. We investigated this outbreak to guide future public health action. Methods We applied the German national case-definition for measles and collected data using the national surveillance system and a questionnaire. Measles cases with disease onset a maximum of 18 days apart and spatial contact (e.g. same household, same school) were summed up in clusters. Two different interventions, which were implemented in schools and kindergartens in Bavaria, were compared by their impact on the size and duration of measles clusters. Susceptible persons were excluded from schools or kindergartens either with the first (intervention A) or second (intervention B) measles case occurring in the respective institution. Results Among the 217 Bavarian measles cases identified from March-July 2008, 28 (13%) cases were attendees of the anthroposophic school in Austria. In total, vaccination status was known in 161 (74%) cases and 156 (97%) of them were not vaccinated. The main factor for non-vaccination was "fear of vaccine-related adverse events" (33%). Twenty-nine (18%) of 161 cases suffered complications. Exclusively genotype D5 was detected. Overall, 184 cases could be epidemiologically grouped into 59 clusters. Of those, 41 clusters could be linked to households and 13 to schools or kindergartens. The effect of intervention A and B was analysed in 10 school or kindergarten clusters. Depending on the respective intervention A or B, the median number of cases per cluster was 3 versus 13 (p = 0.05), and the median duration of a cluster was 3 versus 26 days (p = 0.13). Conclusions Introduction of measles virus into a pocket of susceptible persons (e.g. vaccination opponents or sceptics) may lead to large outbreaks in the general population, if the general population's vaccination coverage is below the WHO recommended level. Education on the safety of measles vaccine needs to be strengthened to increase measles vaccination coverage. Early intervention may limit spread in schools or kindergartens. Suspected measles has to be reported immediately to the local health authorities in order to allow intervention as early as possible.
机译:背景技术在德国,两剂麻疹疫苗接种覆盖率尚不足以防止区域性爆发。在德国的16个联邦州中,疫苗接种率在巴伐利亚州最低,在2008年为85%。从2008年3月至4月中旬,巴伐利亚州的四个邻县报告了55例麻疹病例,这些病例大多与奥地利一所人类营养学校的持续麻疹暴发有关。我们调查了这次疫情,以指导未来的公共卫生行动。方法我们应用了德国国家麻疹病例定义,并使用国家监视系统和问卷调查收集了数据。麻疹病发病间隔最长为18天,并且将空间接触(例如同一家庭,同一所学校)汇总在一起。比较了在巴伐利亚州的学校和幼儿园实施的两种不同干预措施,它们对麻疹群集的大小和持续时间的影响。易感人因在各自机构发生的第一例(干预A)或第二例(干预B)麻疹病例而被排除在学校或幼儿园之外。结果在2008年3月至7月发现的217例巴伐利亚麻疹病例中,有28例(13%)是奥地利人智学校的学生。共有161人(74%)疫苗接种状况已知,其中156人(97%)没有接种疫苗。不接种疫苗的主要因素是“害怕与疫苗相关的不良事件”(33%)。 161例病例中有29例(18%)发生并发症。仅检测到基因型D5。总体上,可以将184例病例按流行病学分为59个群。在这些集群中,有41个集群可以与家庭连接,而13个集群可以与学校或幼儿园连接。在10个学校或幼儿园集群中分析了干预A和B的效果。根据相应的干预措施A或B,每个群集的中位数为3比13(p = 0.05),群集的中位持续时间为3天与26天(p = 0.13)。结论如果普通人群的疫苗接种覆盖率低于WHO建议的水平,则将麻疹病毒引入易感人群(例如接种疫苗的反对者或怀疑论者)的口袋中可能导致普通人群中的大规模爆发。需要加强麻疹疫苗安全性教育,以扩大麻疹疫苗接种范围。早期干预可能会限制在学校或幼儿园中的传播。必须立即向地方卫生当局报告可疑的麻疹,以便尽早进行干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号