首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >The past, present and future of HIV, AIDS and resource allocation
【24h】

The past, present and future of HIV, AIDS and resource allocation

机译:艾滋病毒,艾滋病和资源分配的过去,现在和未来

获取原文
           

摘要

Background How should HIV and AIDS resources be allocated to achieve the greatest possible impact? This paper begins with a theoretical discussion of this issue, describing the key elements of an "evidence-based allocation strategy". While it is noted that the quality of epidemiological and economic data remains inadequate to define such an optimal strategy, there do exist tools and research which can lead countries in a way that they can make allocation decisions. Furthermore, there are clear indications that most countries are not allocating their HIV and AIDS resources in a way which is likely to achieve the greatest possible impact. For example, it is noted that neighboring countries, even when they have a similar prevalence of HIV, nonetheless often allocate their resources in radically different ways. These differing allocation patterns appear to be attributable to a number of different issues, including a lack of data, contradictory results in existing data, a need for overemphasizing a multisectoral response, a lack of political will, a general inefficiency in the use of resources when they do get allocated, poor planning and a lack of control over the way resources get allocated. Methods There are a number of tools currently available which can improve the resource-allocation process. Tools such as the Resource Needs Model (RNM) can provide policymakers with a clearer idea of resource requirements, whereas other tools such as Goals and the Allocation by Cost-Effectiveness (ABCE) models can provide countries with a clearer vision of how they might reallocate funds. Results Examples from nine different countries provide information about how policymakers are trying to make their resource-allocation strategies more "evidence based". By identifying the challenges and successes of these nine countries in making more informed allocation decisions, it is hoped that future resource-allocation decisions for all countries can be improved. Conclusion We discuss the future of resource allocation, noting the types of additional data which will be required and the improvements in existing tools which could be made.
机译:背景如何分配艾滋病毒和艾滋病资源以取得最大的影响?本文从对该问题的理论讨论开始,描述了“基于证据的分配策略”的关键要素。尽管注意到流行病学和经济数据的质量仍然不足以定义这种最佳策略,但确实存在工具和研究可以引导各国以其做出分配决定的方式。此外,有明显迹象表明,大多数国家并未以可能产生最大影响的方式分配其艾滋病毒和艾滋病资源。例如,应当指出,即使邻国的艾滋病毒流行率相似,它们仍然经常以根本不同的方式分配资源。这些不同的分配方式似乎归因于许多不同的问题,包括缺乏数据,现有数据相互矛盾的结果,过分强调多部门应对的需要,缺乏政治意愿,普遍缺乏资源使用效率。他们确实得到了分配,规划不善,对资源的分配方式缺乏控制。方法当前有许多工具可以改善资源分配过程。资源需求模型(RNM)等工具可以为决策者提供更清晰的资源需求构想,而目标和成本效益分配(ABCE)模型等其他工具则可以使各国对如何重新分配资源有更清晰的了解资金。结果来自9个不同国家的示例提供了有关政策制定者如何努力使其资源分配策略更加“基于证据”的信息。通过确定这九个国家在做出更明智的分配决定方面所面临的挑战和成功,希望将来可以改善所有国家的资源分配决定。结论我们讨论了资源分配的未来,指出了将需要的其他数据的类型以及现有工具的改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号