首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Research priorities and potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth: a web-based survey of healthcare professionals, researchers and advocates
【24h】

Research priorities and potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth: a web-based survey of healthcare professionals, researchers and advocates

机译:研究重点和可能的方法,以在死产后的后续妊娠中提供护理信息:基于网络的医疗保健专业人员,研究人员和倡导者调查

获取原文
       

摘要

Objectives To identify research priorities and explore potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following a stillbirth.Design Web-based survey by invitation.Participants Multidisciplinary panel of 79 individuals involved in stillbirth research, clinical practice and/or advocacy from the international stillbirth research community (response rate=64%).Outcome measures Importance of 16 candidate research topics and perceived utility and appropriateness of randomised controlled trial (RCT) methodology for the evaluation of four pertinent interventions: (1) medical therapies for placental dysfunction (eg, antiplatelet agents); (2) additional antepartum fetal surveillance (eg, ultrasound scans); (3) early planned birth from 37 weeks’ gestation and (4) different forms of psychosocial support for parents and families.Results Candidate research topics that were rated as ‘important and urgent’ by the greatest proportion of participants were: medical therapies for placental dysfunction (81%); additional antepartum fetal surveillance (80%); the development of a core outcomes dataset for stillbirth research (79%); targeted antenatal interventions for women who have risk factors (79%) and calculating the risk of recurrent stillbirth according to specific causes of index stillbirth (79%). Whether RCT methodologies were considered appropriate for the four selected interventions varied depending on the criterion being assessed. For example, while 72% of respondents felt that RCTs were ‘the best way’ to evaluate medical therapies for placental dysfunction, fewer respondents (63%) deemed RCTs ethical in this context, and approximately only half (52%) felt that such RCTs were feasible. There was considerably less support for RCT methodology for the evaluation of different forms of psychosocial support, which was reinforced by free-text comments.Conclusions Five priority research topics to inform care in pregnancies after stillbirth were identified. There was support for RCTs in this area, but the panel remained divided on the ethics and feasibility of such trials. Engagement with parents and families is a critical next step.
机译:目标确定研究重点并探索可能的方法以在死胎后的后续妊娠中提供护理通过邀请设计基于Web的调查参与者多学科小组由79名从事死胎研究,临床实践和/或国际死胎研究界的倡导工作的人员组成(回应率= 64%)。结果衡量16个候选研究主题的重要性以及所认为的实用性和随机对照试验(RCT)方法对评估四种相关干预措施的适当性:(1)胎盘功能障碍的药物治疗(例如抗血小板药物) ); (2)额外的产前胎儿监护(例如超声检查); (3)从妊娠37周开始的计划生育和(4)对父母和家人的不同形式的社会心理支持。结果被研究者最多的参与者认为“重要和紧迫”的候选研究主题是:胎盘的药物治疗功能障碍(81%);额外的产前胎儿监护(80%);开发用于死产研究的核心结果数据集(79%);针对有危险因素的妇女进行有针对性的产前干预(79%),并根据指数死产的具体原因计算复发性死胎的风险(79%)。是否认为RCT方法适合于所选择的四种干预措施,取决于所评估的标准。例如,虽然72%的受访者认为RCT是评估胎盘功能障碍药物治疗的“最佳方法”,但在这种情况下,认为RCT是合乎道德的RCT较少,只有63%的受访者认为这种RCT是合乎伦理的是可行的。对RCT方法学评估不同形式的社会心理支持方法的支持大大减少,自由文本评论进一步加强了这一结论。结论确定了五个优先研究主题,以在死产后为孕妇提供护理。在该领域对RCT给予了支持,但专家组在此类试验的伦理和可行性方面仍存在分歧。与父母和家人的交往是至关重要的下一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号