...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Legacy effects of statins on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis
【24h】

Legacy effects of statins on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis

机译:他汀类药物对心血管和全因死亡率的遗留影响:一项荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives To assess evidence for ‘legacy’ (post-trial) effects on cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality and all-cause mortality among adult participants of placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of statins.Design Meta-analysis of aggregate data.Setting/Participants Placebo-controlled statin RCTS for primary and secondary CVD prevention.Methods Data sources: PubMed, Embase from inception and forward citations of Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaborators RCTs to 16 June 2016.Study selection: Two independent reviewers identified all statin RCT follow-up reports including ≥1000 participants, and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality.Data extraction and synthesis: Two independent reviewers extracted data in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.Main outcomes: Post-trial CVD and all-cause mortality.Results We included eight trials, with mean post-trial follow-up ranging from 1.6 to 15.1 years, and including 13?781 post-trial deaths (6685 CVD). Direct effects of statins within trials were greater than legacy effects post-trials. The pooled data from all eight studies showed no evidence overall of legacy effects on CVD mortality, but some evidence of legacy effects on all-cause mortality (p=0.01). Exploratory subgroup analysis found possible differences in legacy effect for primary prevention trials compared with secondary prevention trials for both CVD mortality (p=0.15) and all-cause mortality (p=0.02). Pooled post-trial HR for the three primary prevention studies demonstrated possible post-trial legacy effects on CVD mortality (HR=0.87; 95%?CI 0.79 to 0.95) and on all-cause mortality (HR=0.90; 95%?CI 0.85 to 0.96).Conclusions Possible post-trial statin legacy effects on all-cause mortality appear to be driven by the primary prevention studies. Although these relative benefits were smaller than those observed within the trial, the absolute benefits may be similar for the two time periods. Analysis of individual patient data from follow-up studies after placebo-controlled statin RCTs in lower-risk populations may provide more definitive evidence on whether early treatment of subclinical atherosclerosis is likely to be beneficial.
机译:目的评估他汀类药物的安慰剂对照随机对照试验(RCT)成年参与者对心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率和全因死亡率的``遗留''(试验后)影响证据。设计汇总数据的荟萃分析。设置/参加者安慰剂对照的他汀类药物RCTS用于一级和二级CVD预防方法数据来源:PubMed,从胆固醇治疗试验研究者的RCT的开始引用和向前引用到2016年6月16日的研究。包括1000名以上参与者以及心血管疾病和全因死亡率的汇总报告数据提取和综合:两名独立的审阅者根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目提取数据。主要结果:试验后CVD和结果我们进行了八项试验,平均随访时间为1.6至15.1年,其中包括1次。试验后死亡3,781人(6685 CVD)。他汀类药物在试验中的直接作用大于试验后的遗留作用。来自所有八项研究的汇总数据表明,没有证据表明对CVD死亡率具有遗留效应的整体证据,但有证据表明对全因死亡率具有遗留效应的影响(p = 0.01)。探索性亚组分析发现,与CVD死亡率(p = 0.15)和全因死亡率(p = 0.02)相比,一级预防试验与二级预防试验相比,传统效应可能存在差异。三项主要预防研究的合并试验后HR显示,试验后遗留影响可能对CVD死亡率(HR = 0.87; 95%?CI 0.79至0.95)和全因死亡率(HR = 0.90; 95%?CI 0.85)至0.96)。结论初步预防研究表明,他汀类药物可能对全因死亡率造成的后遗症影响。尽管这些相对收益小于试验中观察到的收益,但两个时期的绝对收益可能相似。在低风险人群中,通过安慰剂对照他汀类药物随机对照试验后对随访研究的单个患者数据进行分析,可能会提供更明确的证据,证明亚临床动脉粥样硬化的早期治疗是否可能有益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号