首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >17: ASSESSING THE BARRIERS TO EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF NURSES IN INTENSIVE CARE UNITS SOCIAL SECURITY HOSPITALS IN TABRIZ
【24h】

17: ASSESSING THE BARRIERS TO EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF NURSES IN INTENSIVE CARE UNITS SOCIAL SECURITY HOSPITALS IN TABRIZ

机译:17:从重症监护病房中护士的角度评估针对循证实践的障碍,塔布里兹的社会保障医院

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Background and aims: In intensive care unit, patients' conditions are more complex and more likely to be at risk of complications and death; therefore, implementing of interventions based on the best evidence is the key issue for nurses. Bridging the gap between scientific evidence and patient care is necessary to accurately identify barriers so; the aim of this study was to determine the barriers to implementing evidence-based care from nurse's view-point in intensive care, social security hospitals in Tabriz. Methods: This is a descriptive- analytical research in which 60 nurses working in intensive care units (ICU, CCU, Dialysis) of social security hospitals in Tabriz participated using census sampling and barriers to implementing EBP were examined using a Funk's EBP Barriers scale which is divided into four subscales: subscales erelated to Nurses, hospital or organization, the quality of research and subscale on how to submit the findings of research. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistical tests (chi-square and Fisher). The significance level of 0.05 was considered in the statistical analysis. Results: The average age of the samples was 36.34. Mostly women (71.2%), mostly undergraduate education (89.8%) and mostly with formal employment status (94.9%) were. Subscale of the Nurses had no significant relationship with any of the variables. Subscale related to organization, with age, education amount and employment status, subscale related to the quality of research with education amount and subscale on how to submit the findings of research with age, gender, work experience and employment status had significant relationship. Overall, education amount and employment status had significant relationship with barriers to implementing evidence-based practice, in this way the nurses had formal employment status and higher education, did more evidence-based care. Conclusion: It is necessary hospitals provide conditions that research and using the results to be given priority. Only nursing education and giving them more authority couldn't be sufficient to implement research findings in clinical practice so, organizational climates of hospitals need to change and reform.
机译:摘要背景与目的:在重症监护病房,患者的病情更加复杂,更有可能发生并发症和死亡。因此,基于最佳证据实施干预措施是护士的关键问题。弥合科学证据和患者护理之间的差距对于准确识别障碍是必要的;这项研究的目的是从大不里士的重症监护,社会保障医院中,从护士的角度确定实施循证护理的障碍。方法:这是一项描述性分析研究,其中60名在大不里士社会保障医院重症监护病房(ICU,CCU,透析)工作的护士参加了普查,并使用Funk的EBP障碍量表对实施EBP的障碍进行了检查。分为四个子量表:与护士,医院或组织有关的子量表,研究质量以及如何提交研究结果的子量表。通过描述性统计检验(卡方检验和费舍尔检验)分析数据。统计分析认为显着性水平为0.05。结果:样本的平均年龄为36.34。大部分是女性(71.2%),大部分是大学本科学历(89.8%),并且大多数是正规职业(94.9%)。护士的分量表与任何变量均无显着关系。与组织有关的量表,与年龄,受教育程度和就业状况有关,与研究质量有关的量表与受教育程度有关,而关于如何提交研究结果的调查量表与年龄,性别,工作经验和就业状况密切相关。总体而言,受教育程度和就业状况与实施循证实践的障碍有显着关系,因此,护士具有正式的就业地位和受过高等教育,做了更多的循证护理。结论:医院必须为研究和使用结果提供优先条件。仅提供护理教育并给予他们更多的权力还不足以在临床实践中实施研究成果,因此,医院的组织氛围需要改变和改革。

著录项

  • 来源
    《BMJ Open》 |2017年第1期|共页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 临床医学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号